Ableton Forum

Tarekith wrote:Unfortunately all the text stays pixelated, which is the most annoying thing for most of us. Still, it's a start, thanks!

One nice thing is, if you use Max 6.1 (high-res-enabled Max), the max for live devices are all in high-res

Open up Live 9's package contents. (right click on app) Do "Show package contents" on the Live.app. Edit Contents/Info.plist using your favorite text editor. Just above </dict> </plist> Place this: <key>NSHighResolutionCapable</key> <true/> Then, make a copy of the app so that OSX will not...

What do you mean by scale exactly? I can adjust the Zoom Display in Live by going to Preferences > Look Feel > Zoom Display. It's an awesome feature. Scale's a bad word on my part, I mean pixel density. They simply need to account for a doubling of pixel density so that on higher resolution display...

press Cmd + 3 and you'll have your grid in ternary mode Unfortunately this only makes creating triplets possible, the BPM still only beats for divisions of 2. What I'd like is for the BPM to be able to act in compound time. In performed music, you have two types of tempo representation (and divisio...

What do you mean by scale exactly? I can adjust the Zoom Display in Live by going to Preferences > Look Feel > Zoom Display. It's an awesome feature. Scale's a bad word on my part, I mean pixel density. They simply need to account for a doubling of pixel density so that on higher resolution display...

I would love to be able to specific a tempo with a dotted quarter so I can do 60bpm at:

^........^
1 and a 2 and a
60 times per minute instead of

^......^
1 and 2 and
60 times per minute

As it is now, the tempo number only references division of 2, or binary meters.

As someone with a degree in computer science, I can assure you it's not so difficult. And as for why? Because it is appropriate. Ableton is a brand, and they have a graphics and advertising department focused on being relevant and current. When they are partnered with cycling '74 and fall behind the...

Just wondering why Max 6.1 looks beautiful on my new laptop, but Ableton won't scale and looks pretty hairy.

It's already vector-based, so it shouldn't be too difficult.

Just wondering why Max 6.1 looks beautiful on my new laptop, but Ableton won't scale and looks pretty hairy.

It's already vector-based, so it shouldn't be too difficult.

i Hope retina-support will come for the final version ... can't understand why they wouldn't support as the graphics already vectorbased Apple sucks anyway, better bring touch support for WIN 8. You know something actually usefull. It's very important that we have people who can't see the forest fo...

chapelier fou wrote:Why the hell is everybody comparing everything with buttons and monome ?

It's everything with an 8x8 rubber grid and monome.

Since I can't find any help in the general forums, I'm assuming these are issues that don't have solutions yet: 1. When I duplicate, I'd like to shift the material beyond my duplication forward so that it doesn't get cut off in place of the new duplication. When I shift-command-d, it duplicates the ...

When I duplicate, I'd like to shift the material beyond my duplication forward so that it doesn't get cut off in place of the new duplication.

When I shift-command-d, it duplicates the time for all tracks, but I'm only interested in manipulating one track.

What am I missing?

I use mouse zoom to zoom into particular regions, but for the clip view I have to move my mouse to the right to move the window left, and for arrangement, I move right to move the window right.

How do I fix this? This type of implementation doesn't seem to make any sense.

Anyone know how to do this? My clips loop at a length that is not a metric/beat division, so quantizing by beat screws everything up.

Can I cue my next clip to launch after the loop finishes playing?