Ableton Forum

also you could set something up in your default track, so that knob a + b are always assigned to sends 1 + 2

thankyou rhythmsickness but if the send is mono why is the advantage of the return being stereo, sorry to sound so clueless?

what lqm said basically, but the sockets do support both balanced and unbalanced leads. The first four channels also have inserts on as well.

edit: incidentally I have one ...

sends are mono sends but stereo returns.
first four channels are mono, yes.

Things like reaktor seem to have more value to my mind.

Jekblad wrote:any cool mac ones?

timefreezer, paulstretch and most of the reaktor ones are mac

Quite fond of timefreezer, also lots of things in reaktor

So was the issue with the fact that it was a freebie?

shame I'da bought what you were originally on about off of ya, regardless of the long winded self defeating explanation you had going there

Thanks RhythmSickness,

Thats some mighty good advice. If I could get one at bargain price, I would consider. One I was watching just went for $615 USD. Not bad.

They are getting old though. Hmmmm. What did you replace your SH 101 with RS?

At the time I just sold it for the cash, these days I ...

they're nice, I paid about £300 for mine when I had one, but if you want to sequence it, then you will need either a kenton kit or a bassstation or a pulse plus, (assuming you don't have lots of analogue gear) also you can't sync the onboard lfo, the solution to which is to get the kenton midi to cv ...

thanks so far. i will try to distribute more free space to it when i got home.

So far, i can give just positive feedback for the so called Frakentosh.
Try it for yourself.

Yeah it's seeming more and more like a no brainer. While apple turn into a phone company, I think it's a good time to get ...

mhh, don't know what you mean.
It's formatted with the NTFS filesystem and should therefore work easily with OSX. Other way around would'nt work.
On the same HD there are 2 more partitions, also with NTFS, which are working fine...

seems like an index problem or so....
any mac user who can jump ...

only wierd thing is that one partition of my external HD isn't recognized by Leopard - no mount point detected......i'm afraid of data loss if i try to fuck with that.



that portion of the external HD might be formatted so osx can't read it maybe?
you could just copy it somewhere whilst under ...

only wierd thing is that one partition of my external HD isn't recognized by Leopard - no mount point detected......i'm afraid of data loss if i try to fuck with that.



that portion of the external HD might be formatted so osx can't read it maybe?
you could just copy it somewhere whilst under ...

Funny thing is that FW interfaces have been touted as being safer for people to use as they aren't as prone to obsolescence as say PCI are.
I suppose they will still work with the new standard, just need an adaptor