Ableton Forum

Sweet! Have wanted a C1 forever, but have waited since it’s not really worth it without full integration.

Nice to see hardware integrations actually making their ways into Ableton.

What Live/Max versions are you using? What has changed recently on your system that could explain that it's not working anymore? Where are you mxj objects located at? Make sure those paths are in your Max files preferences. Actually, adding the exact path to the folder where the class/device files ...

What Live/Max versions are you using? What has changed recently on your system that could explain that it's not working anymore? Where are you mxj objects located at? Make sure those paths are in your Max files preferences. Live 10.1, with the bundles Max8 version. mxj objects are located in the sa...

chapelier fou wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 22, 2019 1:17 pm

What if you save, delete, and reload the device ?

Same. In fact, this seems to be the case with all devices I have using mxj objects. Can anybody confirm mxj working correctly on their system without the device editor open on mac/osx?

Hi. Have a really strange problem. I have a m4l midi effect, a very simple note in/out patch, using a mxj object for doing round-robin logic for automating the sample selector (or any other parameter, assignable). The patch is locked, frozen and saved, and the java object is in the same directory as...

filter_7 wrote: This morning I was listening to some Frank Zappa's interviews in which he says he used to rearrange and modify constantly all his old material.

That's likely since he has the material as raw audio, or quite possibly, on tape...

If somebody come and say: Hey, lets play the track from 3 Years ago we had so much fun with on that party, i have to reply.. UH...Ähh.. that was Live 7.7beta5 and because my hardware changed and i`ve upgraded to Live 9.2 i am not able to load the set containing this track... so thats not pro and i ...

@ rydan Absolutely right Marty Mcfly. But...what if you find 9.2 unusable, you inadvertently save the set in 9.2 official (because you have been used to that function working with while you were switching the set between live 9.1.x and 9.2 Beta for testing) and decide that you want to continue with...

Joel W-J wrote:Apologies if this has already been answered. I just wanted to warn people as quickly as possible when I saw the question...

9.1.x will not open sets saved in 9.2!

Joel

Quite understandable. To be forwards-compatible, you would have to predict the future. That's kind of hard to do... =)

Yup Alias/Ghost clips would be nice...

re:dream wrote:if you don't want hearing damage or, worse, mess up your monitors.

Don't know what monitors you have, but...

you should be aware that any feedback chains constructed will take that signal path out of the PDC calculations. This also happens with the feedback paths generated when sending an effects send/return back on itself too, because you can't calculate the latency. So don't plan on putting your feedbac...

think about Compressor's side chain input... now think about its listen mode... :wink: Yes, but it's a bit tedious. If you want to be able to feed back a chain on itself, you need to set up an effects rack at the beginning of the chain with one chain just passing through (to get the input signal in...

Yeah, well, the workarounds pretty much all stink, so the best workaround I've found is to mixdown a loop of what I'm doing, import to StudioOne free (which has an excellent comping function), do my recording and comping, and then export back from Studio One into Ableton.

Pretty much the only thing I'm really missing from the "core" functionality currently is a proper comping feature.