I was just trying to figure out why MOTU MX4 was not getting poly touch data when hosted in Live.
Crazy. What decade is it?
I mean at least make it an option in midi pref to filter or not.
Search found 20 matches
- Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:55 am
- Forum: Ableton Live
- Topic: No Poly Aftertouch? Really?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 9486
- Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:10 am
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: Max 5.1.1 is online
- Replies: 16
- Views: 5027
MAX 5.1.1 breaking 7up
[edit] Ok, cycling is on it. Thanks guys!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hey guys, I'm one of the developers of SevenUpLive for the Monome. Some users were reporting problems on the monome forum after upgrading to 5.1.1.
Personally I was using Live 8.1.1 and MAX 5.1.0 which works perfectly. I just tried ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hey guys, I'm one of the developers of SevenUpLive for the Monome. Some users were reporting problems on the monome forum after upgrading to 5.1.1.
Personally I was using Live 8.1.1 and MAX 5.1.0 which works perfectly. I just tried ...
- Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:51 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: [c74] Contents of textedit object not saved with liveset
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1109
Re: [c74] Contents of textedit object not saved with liveset
Hey guys...this functionality was working in the few betas before release. We had it working great in SevenUpLive. Somehow it is now broken.
I went back and tried the simple patch above and verified that "pattr" with "parameter mode enable" set is not saving the state of the text object with the ...
I went back and tried the simple patch above and verified that "pattr" with "parameter mode enable" set is not saving the state of the text object with the ...
- Tue Dec 01, 2009 7:41 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: [ddg] Crash of the MAX window enabling Java debug options
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2215
Re: [ddg] Crash of the MAX window enabling Java debug options
The problem is that some of the objects especially regarding the LOM only work inside of Live. I find myself actually connecting with the debugger more when the components are running in Live then when they are open in MAX.
The other option is just leave it the way it is, but fix the crash, so if ...
The other option is just leave it the way it is, but fix the crash, so if ...
- Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:03 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: [ddg] Crash of the MAX window enabling Java debug options
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2215
Re: [ddg] Crash of the MAX window enabling Java debug options
Here are the possible options for debugging
max.jvm.option -Xdebug
max.jvm.option -Xnoagent
max.jvm.option -Djava.compiler=NONE
max.jvm.option -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket\,address=8074\,server=y\,suspend=n
My understanding which may not be correct is that there is always one active jvm spawned ...
max.jvm.option -Xdebug
max.jvm.option -Xnoagent
max.jvm.option -Djava.compiler=NONE
max.jvm.option -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket\,address=8074\,server=y\,suspend=n
My understanding which may not be correct is that there is always one active jvm spawned ...
- Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:22 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: bpatcher patch must be embedded to be reloaded with hot-swap
- Replies: 0
- Views: 843
bpatcher patch must be embedded to be reloaded with hot-swap
If I save device-presets for my device that contains bpatchers, the patches inside my bpatchers are not loaded when I hot-swap a device preset. Regular subpatchers are loaded properly.
To fix this I must embed the patcher in the bpatcher.
It's not a problem, but I'm wondering if this is the ...
To fix this I must embed the patcher in the bpatcher.
It's not a problem, but I'm wondering if this is the ...
- Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:51 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: [IGNORE RESOLVED]..having display issues building bpatchers?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1718
Re: [IGNORE RESOLVED]..having display issues building bpatchers?
[NOT A BUG]
Ok, I'm an idiot. There were multiple nested bpatchers and the inner one was NOT set to "Open in presentation", even though I thought that I had set them all properly. After I did that and save the patch, I'm seeing presentation mode properly.
Ok, I'm an idiot. There were multiple nested bpatchers and the inner one was NOT set to "Open in presentation", even though I thought that I had set them all properly. After I did that and save the patch, I'm seeing presentation mode properly.
- Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:17 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: Feature Request: Send To Next Device
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1967
Re: Feature Request: Send To Next Device
I believe you can navigate from this_device to canonical_parent, then ask for the total number of devices. I do this in the patch I posted, but instead of asking for the number of devices, I ask for device 1.
"path this_device canonical_parent devices 1"
that gets me the second device in my tracks ...
"path this_device canonical_parent devices 1"
that gets me the second device in my tracks ...
- Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:12 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: [ddg] Crash of the MAX window enabling Java debug options
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2215
Re: Crash of the MAX window when enabling Java debug options
That sounds like a pretty viable explanation. I must admit that I find the mxj lifecycle a bit confusing in M4L. Not having an understanding of who is a actually spawning the JVM, I would be happy if JVMs running in Live did not use debug options and JVMs running in MAX did. Or have a separate ...
- Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:38 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: [IGNORE RESOLVED]..having display issues building bpatchers?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1718
Re: Anyone else having display issues building bpatchers?
Yes I did go into every patcher inspector and change to "Open in presentation mode". It doesn't seem to help.
I posted an example patch in the bugs forum as well.
Here are some screen captures
http://experimentsinanalogchaos.com/captures/capture1.jpg
http://experimentsinanalogchaos.com ...
I posted an example patch in the bugs forum as well.
Here are some screen captures
http://experimentsinanalogchaos.com/captures/capture1.jpg
http://experimentsinanalogchaos.com ...
- Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:41 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: [IGNORE RESOLVED]..having display issues building bpatchers?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1718
[IGNORE RESOLVED]..having display issues building bpatchers?
For some reason when I build bpatchers with the beta MAX 5.1.0a1 (40387)
The UI displayed in the bpatchers is in patcher mode, not presentation mode. I cannot get the UI to display properly not matter what I do.
I filed a bug but I wondered if anyone else has seen this issue and especially if there ...
The UI displayed in the bpatchers is in patcher mode, not presentation mode. I cannot get the UI to display properly not matter what I do.
I filed a bug but I wondered if anyone else has seen this issue and especially if there ...
- Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:40 am
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: Feature Request: Send To Next Device
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1967
Re: Feature Request: Send To Next Device
I just created a patch that might help because I had a similar problem.
This patch takes as input the index of the parameter on the next device to the right in the chain that you want to automate. Just use the patch in the device that is to the left of the object you are trying to automate.
It ...
This patch takes as input the index of the parameter on the next device to the right in the chain that you want to automate. Just use the patch in the device that is to the left of the object you are trying to automate.
It ...
- Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:11 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: [Found Answer] Finding this_device using LOM
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1092
Re: [Found Answer] Finding this_device using LOM
Here's a little helpful patch I created to play with paths when searching for params on devices
<pre><code>
----------begin_max5_patcher----------
2229.3oc2a00aiaiE84jeED9ot.ItheIIVTTftyfcwBLsc.Zw9RmhAxRzIbi
rTfDcxjVz+6K+RdTRriDYRj0LCvXGQKKc4Q264dtWR+WmdxhU0eh2t.7cfeG
bxI+0ombhYH8 ...
<pre><code>
----------begin_max5_patcher----------
2229.3oc2a00aiaiE84jeED9ot.ItheIIVTTftyfcwBLsc.Zw9RmhAxRzIbi
rTfDcxjVz+6K+RdTRriDYRj0LCvXGQKKc4Q264dtWR+WmdxhU0eh2t.7cfeG
bxI+0ombhYH8 ...
- Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:25 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: [Found Answer] Finding this_device using LOM
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1092
[Found Answer] Finding this_device using LOM
Is there a way from your M4L device to simply ask for your own id as in "this_device" or live.path?
[edit] I figured it out I think
sending live.path a getchildren message in you M4L device lists this_device as a child so you can also send it "path this_device"
sorry for the noise...just ...
[edit] I figured it out I think
sending live.path a getchildren message in you M4L device lists this_device as a child so you can also send it "path this_device"
sorry for the noise...just ...
- Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:12 pm
- Forum: Max For Live
- Topic: rack subdevices in the LOM: not yet implemented? or bug?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3566
Re: rack subdevices in the LOM: not yet implemented? or bug?
Oh bummer, I need to get access to rack subdevices as well.
Well at least I won't spend more time trying to figure out how to get to them.
I can reorganize my set though to workaround it.
Well at least I won't spend more time trying to figure out how to get to them.
I can reorganize my set though to workaround it.