Ableton Forum

a little bug found:

if to save a preset with sequencer involved in which some steps are disabled, on next loading the patch would work as all of the steps are enabled although it shows correct sequence

whats the CPU tax like..? I'm on a 2Ghz intel core i7 and Dark synth is hard work.. How is Bengal in that department..? well, have to admit that on my i5 @ 2.8Ghz stock presets can easily load CPU up to 70% with nothing else but hey, this is Max Ok. I first thought that the Macros are sufficient bu...

so the device seems to be amazing and with great potential, the only thing i noticed from the very start is that a separate bank on push for bengal's sequencer would be sooo nice)
thanks, Christian, amazing work!

discuss the device here i suppose..

if there are any tracks in your session that need to the be mono (i.e. kicks, sub) you will still have to go back and render them again individually.

why wouldn't you put Utility to all mono tracks and set width to 0 not to go to render process twice?

holding shift + step on sequencer seems to be broken on push 2. it always changes beat division no matter what additional key i press, wether it's shift, select or any other. how to adjust pattern length via push 2?
suggestions?

cheers

indeed, even k-devices (which are much cheaper) provide with pdf manuals, it's an obligatory requirement for such products. maybe they rely on ableton's builtin lessons?

wouldn't it be nice? i can't imagine sonic possibilities with this weird method of mixing. so if this sounds at any point exciting, just upvote this suggestion at centercode

greetings! since Push 2 release my biggest concern was about mappings. i've really got used to these mappings by TomViolenz and i just don't think it'll work like that with Push 2. there are new parameters and options besides. so how are things there? maybe some of you who used Push1 with these scri...

i have a dedicated playlist for such with one single track: NVSBL PPL — keggleg

it's ridiculous to compare version numbers when it comes to Live vs Bitwig discussion to my mind, Live's been being developed for 10+ years while Bitwig started just few years ago. it's just a sequence number. Many things in Live were unique by when they were implemented while Bitwig just takes exis...

what i'm mostly and first of all interested in is its sequencer. is it that capable? is there any point of getting that thing just to use it as a midi source for Ableton?

v00d00ppl wrote:@Ivarin thanks for the report so far. Can you post demos when you have the chance?

here's the very first result of getting acquainted with it https://space.zeo.net/g/4ec5v (20 mins after download)

I think what you are looking for is this https://www.ableton.com/en/packs/oscillot/ I think what you are looking for it the very text I wrote, you quoted, but did not read. probably worth reading what I wrote the idea that MAX users could build the high level Reaktor style functional "blocks", insi...

kleine wrote:

It's a similar issue. I'm not sure yet how to prevent it. We'll see.

thus i've got none of oscillot-powered sets which could be eventually of use. great.

@Ivarin: The problem seem to be the automation on the Grain Resynth "Start" parameter. It overloads the thread and slows down the whole system. We'll have to think about a solution for this parameter - it currently simply shouldn't be automated. Best, Christian this is another set https://space.zeo...