Search found 64 matches

by rtcardinal
Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:55 pm
Forum: Feature Wishlist
Topic: Proper Comping feature
Replies: 8
Views: 743

Re: Proper Comping feature

+1... again... and again... and again... and again. Live is a decade behind with this. And yeah, it's actually quicker for me (and just more awesome and less frustrating) to record and edit takes in studio one, bounce them in place, and drag directly back in to Live from Studio One than any of the A...
by rtcardinal
Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:21 pm
Forum: Music and Audio Production
Topic: Ableton Live 10
Replies: 206
Views: 31777

Re: Ableton Live 10

-Better tools for comping, vocals, and take management.
I do all of this is in Studio One, and it's light years ahead of Live for that. I'd love to see an innovative solution for this kind of work in Live.

-PDC for automation
by rtcardinal
Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:44 am
Forum: Music and Audio Production
Topic: The Great BitWig Migration
Replies: 863
Views: 59481

Re: The Great BitWig Migration

Definitely going to give it a serious look. I make my living with Live, so it definitely wouldn't be an overnight migration for myself. As a professional, it'd be kind of silly for me to NOT take a look at what could be the evolution of the paradigm I work in. It would be equally as silly to jump ov...
by rtcardinal
Sun Feb 02, 2014 11:19 pm
Forum: Music and Audio Production
Topic: Increasing overall track volume after volume automation?
Replies: 14
Views: 1853

Re: Increasing overall track volume after volume automation?

Or just shift / multi-select all of the faders you want to move, and move them all at the same time by the same amount. Something you CAN'T do if you have automation on the channel faders.
by rtcardinal
Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:06 pm
Forum: Music and Audio Production
Topic: Increasing overall track volume after volume automation?
Replies: 14
Views: 1853

Re: Increasing overall track volume after volume automation?

As convenient as it is to simply automate the channel faders in live, I avoid doing it for this same reason. I like keep my faders for overall 'trim' on the volume so that I can look at multiple channels at a glance and make adjustments in the mixer. It easy to do this afterward with a utility, but ...
by rtcardinal
Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:08 am
Forum: Feature Wishlist
Topic: Automation 'lock' / step edit mode.
Replies: 0
Views: 243

Automation 'lock' / step edit mode.

It would be great if we could add/edit automation points simply by setting parameter values on devices and plugins, with or without having to use a controller. I guess the closest analogy I can think of for this is 'Parameter locks' in the Elektron devices. Or a step/point edit mode for automation, ...
by rtcardinal
Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:59 am
Forum: Feature Wishlist
Topic: fix saturator HQ mode
Replies: 1
Views: 264

Re: fix saturator HQ mode

Sounds like they just never got around to it, and haven't unified the labeling for oversampling. Would be good to get this fixed if its a bug.
by rtcardinal
Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:37 pm
Forum: Music and Audio Production
Topic: Bitwig 1.0
Replies: 322
Views: 24649

Re: Bitwig 1.0

Of course, cheaper is always nicer. Personally, I think the price is completely reasonable. It's middle of the road for a cross platform, feature rich DAW. It wasn't long ago that this stuff $800-1500, despite wether the fact that you were a hobbyist or not. If you know what you're doing, you could...
by rtcardinal
Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:09 pm
Forum: Music and Audio Production
Topic: Bitwig 1.0
Replies: 322
Views: 24649

Re: Bitwig 1.0

Of course, cheaper is always nicer. Personally, I think the price is completely reasonable. It's middle of the road for a cross platform, feature rich DAW. It wasn't long ago that this stuff $800-1500, despite wether the fact that you were a hobbyist or not. If you know what you're doing, you could ...
by rtcardinal
Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:13 am
Forum: Music and Audio Production
Topic: EQ and mixing
Replies: 4
Views: 381

Re: EQ and mixing

Not wrong at all. Do what you have to do.
Personally, I probably automate EQ more than I automate everything else.
by rtcardinal
Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:23 am
Forum: Feature Wishlist
Topic: Group track doesn't work like a true bus...
Replies: 25
Views: 2387

Re: Group track doesn't work like a true bus...

Still not clear on what you're after. Any examples? Like the ability to route other tracks outside of the group to the group channel or something? Just make the Group channel a normal audio channel? I for one would like improved/easier routing on normal audio tracks to facilitate what people are lo...
by rtcardinal
Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:02 pm
Forum: Music and Audio Production
Topic: DRUM RACK VS INDIVIDUAL AUDIO SAMPLES
Replies: 54
Views: 5390

Re: DRUM RACK VS INDIVIDUAL AUDIO SAMPLES

I prefer to work with audio where ever I can, and keep the in the arrangement view for context's sake. I like being able to visually see where my parts (especially drums and bass) line up or fall against each other, and quickly resample layers together. I also like having precise envelope control wi...
by rtcardinal
Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:03 am
Forum: Feature Wishlist
Topic: Group track doesn't work like a true bus...
Replies: 25
Views: 2387

Re: Group track doesn't work like a true bus...

Maybe be able to send one of the (grouped) track to one of the "normal" send/return tracks. Huh? Grouped tracks have sends and can send just fine to return tracks. What's the issue here? Do you mean drum rack chains? I just want all the features of bus tracks Like what ? Proper routing. It's not fa...
by rtcardinal
Fri Jan 03, 2014 7:18 am
Forum: Music and Audio Production
Topic: Re-join audioclips
Replies: 19
Views: 2825

Re: Re-join audioclips

Consolidate does indeed make a new file, and it's a destructive edit.
The only way to do it non-destructively is you re-drag edges of the clip to it's original length.
by rtcardinal
Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:26 am
Forum: Music and Audio Production
Topic: Bitwig 1.0
Replies: 322
Views: 24649

Re: Bitwig 1.0

Most likely there will be a demo, if I like it, I'm getting it. If I end up enjoying it more than Live, then I will continue. It definitely has some features that look exciting to me. I've been using Live since version 3, I'd be a fool not to be interested in something that appears to be the progre...