Ableton Forum

Yes, discussions like these are very helpful. Da Hand and fishmonkey somehow was able to give me a good picture. Although all the others tried. The key word for me was that the wave is not "static". and that the room itself is not vibrating. Nokatus tried, but his analogy of the scanner wa...

No,PC.

Any ideas here? Can it be done? Been doing some research, mostly you tube, but nothing practical yet. My problem is that I have an old reliable Tascam 144 and want to add more output ports to my setup. Probably there is another way to get this done. Of course it may time to upgrade anyhow. Looking a...

Your point is taken Nokatus. I was wrongly theorizing that the intensity of the displacement of the air particles that are propagating the wave would give our ears the same experience of the frequency even before the wave has been completed. However, I am still not seeing any explanation as to how o...

yep, what he said. you are thinking about a sound wave as a static/standing wave, when it is actually flowing back and forth, past and through you. of course, in a room you are hearing a bunch of reflections and interactions of the waves too, so that can mess things up really badly. however, in mos...

you can check other forums as Gearslutz (they have a dedicated subforum to acoustic treatment) and KVRaudio (they have lots of dedicated subforums). And then come back to Live forum. I like it here, wish I didn't have to leave. Why couldn't we have a dedicated subforum like the rest? That's my point.

Which leads me to an offshoot of this: In a room smaller than the one in the OP, would it be practical to use a subwoofer? Would there be any usable signal to monitor at that frequency and below?

You don’t need to experience an entire cycle of a wave to hear it. Accepted, But hear it as what? And I suggested that we hear it as distortion or only in terms of the other sinusoidals that make it up. Because within that room it would not have completed a full cycle, so it must be unidentifiable....

Well, the peeps that know me here will know that I tend to come up with some seemingly absurd observations and arguments. There are so many things I can think of to start an argument, but just off the bat: Say, I have a room and none of it's individual dimensions is bigger than 18 ft. and by my reck...

Don't mean to be offensive, but being from the old school, I like to just hit the nail on the head. Been finding it hard to find any threads that are directly related to the captioned sub-forum. This category should be split up into at least 10 sub-forums. I use Live for studio work. Would love to s...

My top pro tip: Check the date of the OP's post before answering OP. Specifically the year . Advanced level Check OP's Last visited date, just in case OP still wants answers to 5 year old questions. Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:05 am oh. Bet you didn't realize till you saw Tone Deft's reply. :) Startled me t...

Well if the name "Studio One" is anything to go by, I'd say it was definitely made for reggae music production. I like the word "organic" which Martin used to describe. In this respect, it seems like a cross between Cubase's organic feel and Live's easy GUI.

Thanks fishmonkey, I kinda see what you are trying to say. So I am thinking that this is where the K System comes in. By selecting 83, 74 dBSPL(or any other level as recommended on the room size chart) this can be tied to 0 dB on the K System which can be -12,-14 or -20 dBFS. Therefore, the ultimate...

Just saw this link https://youtu.be/WrrlrRj7piI when I was researching how to incorporate k system in live.