Ableton Forum

Does anyone else have this problem? I would like to see this. I am hoping it touches on JS...

One thing that I noticed was that the "filter" is not midi-mappable. However, this can fixed by control/command clicking on the subpatcher, selecting to edit the original, copying these guts and pasting them into the actual patch. Then, swapping the toggles with live.toggles would probably...

This doesn't strike me as necessarily orders of magnitude harder. It's either possible or not. My assumption without looking at it is that is involves the pattr system. If that's the case, then it enables interpolation right off the bat. I've been meaning to check into this patch. Perhaps I'll look ...

henke wrote:i am working on a 'commercial' / share-ready version of my send based spatialization patches, and they kind of support stereo signals. but i am not sure when they will be ready....

Robert

I am really looking forward to this

I'm not on making surround sound but maybe this tutorial helps a bit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykBTt5Tz_U4 Have phun :) T Interesting :-) Spent such a large chunk of 2010 working on freelance, collaborative and personal projects in surround sound. The patch presented in this video is like a v...

I was able to load the lessons, but for the new API tutorials, all I get are the first page of each. It shows four pages, but pages 2-4 are something completely different. Is there a quick fix? Should I just delete these and reinstall from a specific link?

Thank you

Thank you worked!

Been trying to find this new content. Downloaded last two recent betas of Live and most recent of max. Nothing is showing up under spotlight searches for api 01-api 06 nor under the max audio device tab.

I am not sure what you are asking. Which patch? Specifically, which would you want data sent from; sound source? Spatialization engine? The answer is, probably not a big deal. Currently I have a patch that sends from max to arduino via serial and from max to maxforlive via udp. It's all just data th...

Two more days to check out my installation, if you are in the Pittsburgh area: ibrill.com
And for those who asked for video, I finally got some time lapse shorts that do the visuals justice:
http://vimeo.com/20088948

Here is a video of the work:
http://vimeo.com/19011895

It does not do it justice. Hard to present a minimal 8.1 sound system in stereo and the low-level lights are optimized to adjust in human eyes, not cameras.

The piece is rocking. You should check it out if you are near Pittsburgh.

Hey,

My installation in Pittsburgh has been a major success. If you are in the area, please check it out!

There are some pix on my website:

http://ibrill.com/blog/?p=373

hoffman2k wrote:If a parameter is mapped to Live.remote~, the original parameter will be locked. (gray and can't be moved).
To unlock it again, you need to send "ID 0" to that live.remote~instance.

Awesome. Thanks Bjorn! This all sounds very familiar, like from a year ago when I built this set...

Lol. I am not crazy after all. Just forgot about a patch from last February that, well, still is relevant, but happens to control the first parameter of the second device on each of the first 50 tracks...

It helps when you read your own comments too...

Alright, so it appears that the set is haunted. Somehow managed to avoid having to learn how to release ids from the api. Now I can honestly say that I have no idea how to edit or undo an assignment to the live api. I thought they just released when you delete a device or chose not to initiate a pat...