Ableton Forum

Hi,

how do I loop a clip in the session window at its normal speed without any changes of the sound ?

Whenever I insert clips, the sound seem to have changed..

I simply want the progamme to unintelligently loop an audio clip without changing its content

Thanks

It would be great if it were possible to freeze groups ! !

Cool, thanks

David Abravanel wrote:Hi, just a note that we aren't consistently involved in topics on this subforum. If you'd like to contact Ableton about an issue, then you're best bet is to get in touch with support: http://www.ableton.com/support

Thanks

Laura_Live wrote:I find it annoying that I always have to switch back to 'none' when wanting to insert a midi clip with a right mouse click

Ok, I can do it with CTRL+SHIFT+M

I find it annoying that I always have to switch back to 'none' when wanting to insert a midi clip with a right mouse click

! Thanks

OK, I have found a solution but this is a MAJOR BUG in Live. :cry: :cry: :cry: The panning automation only renders correctly at all buffer sizes, meaning 'in time', as drawn to the grid, if the VSTi instrument is flattened before rendering. It is a repeatable bug. Ableton, please comment what you m...

OK, I have found a solution but this is a MAJOR BUG in Live. :cry: :cry: :cry: The panning automation only renders correctly at all buffer sizes, meaning 'in time', as drawn to the grid, if the VSTi instrument is flattened before rendering. Merely freezing the track containing the VSTi instrument wi...

I think I posted this in the wrong part of the forum but I would appreciate it if someone knowledgeable could clarify my issue. I am in the middle of an important mixdown and I require clear information about whether the rendered mix (exported audio) is different at different buffer sizes. Does it m...

Could someone from Ableton please step in and clarify the issue.

well i think their is something really strange in your setup cause i just rendered a 8 bar loop on wich i automated pans @ 2048, then 512, 128 and 64 samples and they all return null results via a phase cancelation test, hopefully.. what differences do you see? is it a visible offset? maybe coming ...

fx23 wrote:it shouldn't

Well, automate panning in a mix and render it out at different buffersizes, then compare the files.. they won't match up..

Am I doing something wrong here ? ??

? ?

It seems it does..

I noticed that delay compensation does not work for panning automations. Automated pannings are out of time when comparing buffersize 32 with buffersize 4096. Also, and this one weighs really hard Rendering out a file with automated panning at those two buffersizes creates files that don't match up....