Ableton Forum

Good idea. I guess I'll do that for a few really nice FXs I use all the time. Thank you for the tip!

Hello maybe with the new browser system in Live 6 there would be a way to select a specific Reaktor instrument from inside Live instead of going through the tedious task to do this in Reaktor's browser? I haven't had the occasion to look too much into the new browser possibilities but this would be ...

If I understand what you suggest the second "call fire" should be calculated in relation with the moment "call fire" is triggered, and not the moment it is executed. (which, we don't know when it happens). In that case I'll need to use [transport]'s units. Never really relied on ...

Ok I understand. Actually I don't need a quantization of 1/32 all the time, it just seemed clear that I shouldn't try without quantization at all and I wanted to do my tests with the shortest quantized value. So if you say the latency variation is around 50 ms which corresponds to a 1/32 note at 150...

The [counter 32] in loop triggers a clip recording even without pressing "call fire". But I'll make a version with [metro] and the arguments as you suggest instead of [clocker]. The reason behind it is simply to be able to record a clip that is exactly 1 (or more) bars long without the nee...

Hello, how could I improve the accuracy of the patch below? Cheers toscanini <pre><code> ----------begin_max5_patcher---------- 916.3oc4X0taZCCE82gmBq76rr3jXm3IsIs8ZLMgLAC31fclsoqaU6ce1N.M zxGADPoZpp.4hStGNGeuGa+zffvQxGY5Pvm.eGDD7zff.eHWffkWGDNm9XUM U6GVXkb9blvDF09cF1iFebMy.lVKGQqA+bAUX3+gALR.7iYofI...

Thank you for the answers, straightforward actually.
cheers toscanini

Hello, I have just upgraded to Live 9 and would like to install both 64 and 32 bit versions. Unfortunately they are called the same (Ableton Live 9 Standard) which makes it impossible to install the second next to the first. I am not so confortable about renaming them, not even sure if I can. What i...

Great, thanks!

Hello,
the title says it all, I haven't upgraded yet and I'd like to know...
cheers toscanini

In the end there is some progress. The initialization time for the live.remote~s is definitely shorter.

And I am thinking of going back to my former version regarding the IDs, because I need that logic to send ID 0s. Mostly because of the visual aspect, so I can distinguish what I am controlling.

@broc, I tried to follow your idea of two depths of poly~, it isn't very organic (in the sense that I don't really know what I am doing :lol: ) so I wasn't really expecting it to solve anything and it doesn't. I'd really need to understand more about the initialization here. Anyway here's a version ...

Here is a version where IDs are assigned at loadbang. Unfortunately this doesn't get rid of the "warming up" problem, OTOH I have all kinds of bad initialization problems now :P <pre><code> ----------begin_max5_patcher---------- 4997.3oc6cs0aiqij94z+JDLNKFfcSxJdmZeXAl4s42PeNHP1VIQmVVxvVI8 ...

With 8 faders working simultaneously I'd have a CPU rise of about 2% which seems acceptable, I wonder if sending ID0's to former selection would lower that.
And thank you for pointing out the direct ID assignment!

Ok thanks to broc's patch I have made some progress, here is a first version of an 8x8 track/send controller using 8+1 MIDI controls. To see it work throw 8 audio or MIDI instrument (because of the showing sends) tracks and 8 return tracks into a Live set. I wanted to use jit.cellblock so I ended up...