Let's Geek Out Over the New Star Trek Trailer

nebulae · Post by **nebulae** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:01 pm

sparklepuff wrote:
nebulae wrote: who wants to bone uhura?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you do.

geez, dude, do you know me AT ALL?!?!?

hubba hubba....

Homebelly · Post by **Homebelly** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:02 pm

sparklepuff wrote:
nebulae wrote: who wants to bone uhura?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you do.

We can top and tail..
She's got a might purdy mouth ed'

Okay..
That was not needed and not necessary..

Homebelly · Post by **Homebelly** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:03 pm

pixelbox wrote:Wynona Rider as Spock's mom = FAIL

Do you supposed she paid for the dress.

nebulae · Post by **nebulae** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:05 pm

Homebelly wrote:We can top and tail..
She's got a might purdy mouth ed'

Okay..
That was not needed and not necessary..

wow, this went into the gutter fast!

you boyz down under sure know how to party.

timothyallan · Post by **timothyallan** » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:08 pm

Neb could play finger cymbals for her.

tylast · Post by **tylast** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:53 am

nebulae wrote:I think it's gonna be cooler than Wrath of Khan

Never! But hopefully it will be close.

rozling · Post by **rozling** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:55 am

Simon Pegg as Scotty could possibly be utter greatness, but I'm afraid so far this looks like - and I've said this before - James Bond Jr. for Star Trek.

Though that's not entirely a bad thing, James Bond Jr. was great for killing some time.

blaugruen7 · Post by **blaugruen7** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:30 am

could anybody cut these actionfilms a bit faster, please?

man, they are only 10 scenes a second. i get endless bored.
why waste that space, i am guessing the cinema film format
comes at least with 25frames a second, so just
fill this just up with cuts of different scenes.

COME ON, MAN.
i am so hollow inside me and i am so very much disconnected from myself,
is it so hard to see that i will just stay in a constant state of epilepsy?
fuck.

now back to my place in front of my stroboscope

fatrabbit · Post by **fatrabbit** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:38 pm

blaugruen7 wrote:could anybody cut these actionfilms a bit faster, please?

man, they are only 10 scenes a second. i get endless bored.
why waste that space, i am guessing the cinema film format
comes at least with 25frames a second, so just
fill this just up with cuts of different scenes.

COME ON, MAN.
i am so hollow inside me and i am so very much disconnected from myself,
is it so hard to see that i will just stay in a constant state of epilepsy?
fuck.

now back to my place in front of my stroboscope

Yeah, I know what you mean. That and shaky camera in films. It can really add to the action, but I hate it when it's so fake (the director has obviously said to his cameraman... "that's not shaky enough! 500% more shake in this scene!"). It's just done to death now and makes me nauseous.

blaugruen7 · Post by **blaugruen7** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:08 pm

yes, shaky camera. this appears as a new trend in action films to me.

yesterday i was in the Bond movie.

it just was too much. it doesnt help i think.
next time i am filming a major hollywood blockbuster i will have to talk to the camera man.

rozling · Post by **rozling** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:38 pm

Didn't Spielberg invent some mechanism or possibly even a camera for Saving Ryan's Privates, that shakes the lens when you push a button?

I blame NYPD Blue.

forge · Post by **forge** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:39 pm

rozling wrote:Simon Pegg as Scotty could possibly be utter greatness, but I'm afraid so far this looks like - and I've said this before - James Bond Jr. for Star Trek.

Though that's not entirely a bad thing, James Bond Jr. was great for killing some time.

yeah man - Simon Pegg has probably gone mad or attained nirvana over that one - he's the supreme film geek and it's probably the role he was born to play

Eric Bana is going to be interesting too!

edit: just watched the trailer!!

when's it out?

forge · Post by **forge** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:08 pm

HA HA.. this post on that page has to be made up

Disgustng tripe... not believable and not even in the same reality as all that has gone before... this is a failure before it is born. I will not pay a cent to see it.

- T. Kirk James, Federation Village, 19/11/2008 12:28

Cyberstar · Post by **Cyberstar** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:56 pm

The actor playing spock isn't he from heroes ?

snakedogman · Post by **snakedogman** » Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:47 pm

blaugruen7 wrote:yes, shaky camera. this appears as a new trend in action films to me.

yesterday i was in the Bond movie.

it just was too much. it doesnt help i think.
next time i am filming a major hollywood blockbuster i will have to talk to the camera man.

I too think the new Bond movie could have done with about 50% less shake. Very hard to follow at times.