Bass question!
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:16 am
Bass question!
Hi, I have a bass line in one of my tracks; the problem is that the high notes are much louder than the low notes (It's a high to low arpeggio bass line).
There are two options that I'm aware of:
1) Compress the bass so that it brings the volume in line.
2) Automate the volume of the higher notes.
The problem with compressing the bass is that I don't want to lose the shape of the sound. Compression in my experience could make it 'blocky'.
Any thoughts? Have you had the same issue?
Cheers!
There are two options that I'm aware of:
1) Compress the bass so that it brings the volume in line.
2) Automate the volume of the higher notes.
The problem with compressing the bass is that I don't want to lose the shape of the sound. Compression in my experience could make it 'blocky'.
Any thoughts? Have you had the same issue?
Cheers!
-
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:09 pm
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:40 am
- Location: Bristol, South West, UK
- Contact:
Is it a MIDI track with a software instrument of some kind, so that adjusting
the velocity settings on the instrument might be an option? If so, my preferred
way of doing this is to set velocity modulation to 100%, select all the notes in
the relevant clip and adjust the velocity to 127, and then, finally, turn down
the velocity to on the notes that are too loud
the velocity settings on the instrument might be an option? If so, my preferred
way of doing this is to set velocity modulation to 100%, select all the notes in
the relevant clip and adjust the velocity to 127, and then, finally, turn down
the velocity to on the notes that are too loud
+ 1 Volume automationWarminstrel wrote:I personaly use little volume envelopes in preference to using compression where ever possibe for the exact reason you gave.
MacBook Pro 2.4 Ghz 2Gb
OS X.5.7 | MOTU Ultralite | Live 8 | Ableton Drum Machine's | Addictive Drums | Conectiv+ Torq | Ms. Pinky | AudioDamage
OS X.5.7 | MOTU Ultralite | Live 8 | Ableton Drum Machine's | Addictive Drums | Conectiv+ Torq | Ms. Pinky | AudioDamage
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:16 am
It's a pretty common problem I think, as things just behave a little differently in lower frequencies than upper frequencies. I'd recommend figuring out if it's lows, mids, highs that are getting out of line because different solutions will work better in each case. Or the right solution will be sort of multiband with a few different techniques.
This is idiosyncratic but how I tend to think about things:
If it's in the lows, velocity or volume automation or using a second synth (Operator is godly for this) that's subtly adding smoother lows are what I like to use. Since this synth can be layered underneath, a trick I like is limiting this sub synth to a one octave range or so with a MIDI rack, bumping notes out of this range up or down an octave. Compression down here has to be really carefully applied IMO, although it can do some cool things.
If it's sort of mid-range, EQ (cutting mostly) can help, like 400-1k range is usually a good place to look for some pretty severe cuts. 120-350 is a lot more demanding of finer precision but also is a range where some cuts could be made.
In the highs (over 1k? or so) I think compression works well, as well as shelf EQ'ing, additionally any kind of stereo effect can work well in this range.
One thing to watch out for is filter resonance in the low frequencies, this can be impossible to tame - it sounds good sometimes but I just think it's too unmanageable to try and use it until everything else in a mix is set. Took me a long time to figure that out.
This is idiosyncratic but how I tend to think about things:
If it's in the lows, velocity or volume automation or using a second synth (Operator is godly for this) that's subtly adding smoother lows are what I like to use. Since this synth can be layered underneath, a trick I like is limiting this sub synth to a one octave range or so with a MIDI rack, bumping notes out of this range up or down an octave. Compression down here has to be really carefully applied IMO, although it can do some cool things.
If it's sort of mid-range, EQ (cutting mostly) can help, like 400-1k range is usually a good place to look for some pretty severe cuts. 120-350 is a lot more demanding of finer precision but also is a range where some cuts could be made.
In the highs (over 1k? or so) I think compression works well, as well as shelf EQ'ing, additionally any kind of stereo effect can work well in this range.
One thing to watch out for is filter resonance in the low frequencies, this can be impossible to tame - it sounds good sometimes but I just think it's too unmanageable to try and use it until everything else in a mix is set. Took me a long time to figure that out.
http://www.soundcloud.com/xherv
I know EVERYTHING that I know and you don't know, and don't know what I don't know that you know, so I'll ignore that stuff. Wassup now?
I know EVERYTHING that I know and you don't know, and don't know what I don't know that you know, so I'll ignore that stuff. Wassup now?
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:16 am
-
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 7:25 pm
the issue here can be resolved by simple EQ. shelve the offending frequencies, compress, and viola!
regarding massive issue.
you waveform envelope is under 4env where you can change the volume shape of the noise, and then if you attach the yellow velocity mod from the bottom right, to the amp knob of an osc, you have velocity control of the oscs independently.
regarding massive issue.
you waveform envelope is under 4env where you can change the volume shape of the noise, and then if you attach the yellow velocity mod from the bottom right, to the amp knob of an osc, you have velocity control of the oscs independently.
Last edited by Superchibisan on Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:30 am, edited 1 time in total.