Analog and Virtual analag hardware synths
-
- Posts: 7251
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:34 am
- Contact:
Yes!xh9o wrote:its less important if you love (yourself while) making music, its more important how much you love music.
Spot on. This is also why I think your comment at the beginning of this thread, "by listening to your music i must doubt you really hear where analog takes its value from", is rather empty bickering in the end.xh9o wrote:the digital/analog is totally irrelevant for writing harmonies and songs.
Loving music and expressing yourself with your chosen tools is a far superior notion than your, or my, or someone else's opinion on digital/analog. As you have pointed out, you have shunned pre-conceived standards and want to take your own path, so you should also beware (again, you wouldn't call it that, but I would) dictating just another standard by resorting to authorities when you want to demonstrate your own superiority. "There is enough people on the same side with me", "real pros", that's as empty talk as any.
As you're saying on page two "i really can´t waste more time with silly internet people", but you're still going on after hitting page thirteen, it speaks more loudly of your stature than such anecdotes.
Respectfully, you don't know my way to work.xh9o wrote:i just explain why i prefer the way i do work against your way to work.
In my personal and vain opinion, there are vast worlds of music to be explored and expressed in acoustic, electronic, and in the latter case both analog and purely digitally synthesized means (that is, sources which, by their nature, can't be realized using analog circuitry in the first place). Beautiful albums have been and will be released using every method conceivable, and combinations thereof. There's hell of a lot interesting digital stuff going on right now, and its musical uses are far more important and far reaching than petty bickering.xh9o wrote:and for me it was great fun to confront all your personal and vain opinions with simple facts, and while that giving the truth the privilege to be my opinion. great fun, thanks for all.
As for me, it was also great fun to confront your personal opinions, briefly, with my own - while the truth is most probably somewhere else to be found. Thanks, and take care.
-
- Posts: 6302
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
I had an inkling this was the case the way you kept using the term "songwriting." That's very telling of a narrow pop-centric approach to creating music. Which is fine. I do plenty of that myself. But to talk about "songwriting" as if you're speaking of the end-all-be-all of musical creation is naïve at best.xh9o wrote:i would not consider me a musician.
[/classical music snob rant]
Unsound Designer
stringtapper wrote:I had an inkling this was the case the way you kept using the term "songwriting." That's very telling of a narrow pop-centric approach to creating music. Which is fine. I do plenty of that myself. But to talk about "songwriting" as if you're speaking of the end-all-be-all of musical creation is naïve at best.xh9o wrote:i would not consider me a musician.
no its naive to call pop the only way of songwriting. nearly every better track is somehow a song, though it often differs from pop music formatation and the very direct approach of that format. but i don´t see the point of what you try to say. maybe there is no.
Last edited by xh9o on Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 7251
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:34 am
- Contact:
Johnisfaster wrote:I totally do.xh9o wrote:Johnisfaster wrote:hey xh9o, are you a douche bag? if so, post any reply at all.
thanks.
whatever you need to feel better.
look everyone, he admits it!
yeah i admit it again: you are king, i´m twat. on that virtual platform, just for you. ain´t that supergreat for you? not the twat yourself this time... hell, lets celebrate it.
-
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 3:05 am
this sounds like the output of a random sentence generator.xh9o wrote:
and for me it was great fun to confront all your personal and vain opinions with simple facts, and while that giving the truth the privilege to be my opinion. great fun, thanks for all.
nathannn wrote:i will block everyone on this forum if i have to.
-
- Posts: 7251
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:34 am
- Contact:
hey, at least you got one thing right in this thread.xh9o wrote:Johnisfaster wrote:I totally do.xh9o wrote:
whatever you need to feel better.
look everyone, he admits it!
yeah i admit it again: you are king, i´m twat. on that virtual platform, just for you. ain´t that supergreat for you? not the twat yourself this time... hell, lets celebrate it.
It was as if someone shook up a 6 foot can of blood soda and suddenly popped the top.
adventurepants_ wrote:this sounds like the output of a random sentence generator.xh9o wrote:
and for me it was great fun to confront all your personal and vain opinions with simple facts, and while that giving the truth the privilege to be my opinion. great fun, thanks for all.
but who are you? ...
-
- Posts: 7251
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:34 am
- Contact:
I was thinking the same thing yesturday. I wouldn't be surprised if he was using one.adventurepants_ wrote:this sounds like the output of a random sentence generator.xh9o wrote:
and for me it was great fun to confront all your personal and vain opinions with simple facts, and while that giving the truth the privilege to be my opinion. great fun, thanks for all.
It was as if someone shook up a 6 foot can of blood soda and suddenly popped the top.
-
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 3:05 am
Im a screen scraper programmed by Haliburton.xh9o wrote:adventurepants_ wrote:this sounds like the output of a random sentence generator.xh9o wrote:
and for me it was great fun to confront all your personal and vain opinions with simple facts, and while that giving the truth the privilege to be my opinion. great fun, thanks for all.
but who are you? ...
nathannn wrote:i will block everyone on this forum if i have to.