perhaps.sweetjesus wrote: by that logic, unix systems are slow pieces of shit that arent worth chucking on any server.
or you could say, if it aint broke, don't fix it.
something m$ has failed to grasp.
perhaps.sweetjesus wrote: by that logic, unix systems are slow pieces of shit that arent worth chucking on any server.
dunno - windows vista was broke (not as bad as ppl say in my opinion), and win 7 sounds like it will fix many issues. i reckon for the first time in a long time, microsoft might have actually listened. if windows 7 is stable, then i will avoid getting a mac, and im sure other people thing the same.otnooishphoo wrote:perhaps.sweetjesus wrote: by that logic, unix systems are slow pieces of shit that arent worth chucking on any server.
or you could say, if it aint broke, don't fix it.
something m$ has failed to grasp.
funny that u say this while i was discussing the new warp system in Live 8 with another friend.otnooishphoo wrote:or you could say, if it aint broke, don't fix it.
robleighton22 wrote:dunno - windows vista was broke (not as bad as ppl say in my opinion), and win 7 sounds like it will fix many issues. i reckon for the first time in a long time, microsoft might have actually listened. if windows 7 is stable, then i will avoid getting a mac, and im sure other people thing the same.otnooishphoo wrote:perhaps.sweetjesus wrote: by that logic, unix systems are slow pieces of shit that arent worth chucking on any server.
or you could say, if it aint broke, don't fix it.
something m$ has failed to grasp.
otnooishphoo wrote: but they can't/won't drop legacy support.
you are such an idiot. pretty much everything you type is retardedotnooishphoo wrote:microsoft needs to bite the bullet and drop legacy support.
thats what mac did.
mac's would suck today if it was still OS9 code.
then they can get on with it and make a streamlined modern os.
i don't doubt that they already have such an os in their labs.
but they can't/won't drop legacy support.
http://forum.ableton.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=98872TITBAG wrote:you are such an idiot. pretty much everything you type is retardedotnooishphoo wrote:microsoft needs to bite the bullet and drop legacy support.
thats what mac did.
mac's would suck today if it was still OS9 code.
then they can get on with it and make a streamlined modern os.
i don't doubt that they already have such an os in their labs.
but they can't/won't drop legacy support.
you don't know shit about code do ya....otnooishphoo wrote:djsynchro wrote:Vista was the OS to skip, but Windows 7 is going to be the one to get. only took MS about a decade to catch up & produce a modern OS they suck but you know that already. I will give it another couple of months and then switch I guess.
but it's not modern, it's the same base NT code from the 90's
they just keep adding bloat to it.
sure it runs faster, the machines are faster now.
otnooishphoo wrote:djsynchro wrote:Vista was the OS to skip, but Windows 7 is going to be the one to get. only took MS about a decade to catch up & produce a modern OS they suck but you know that already. I will give it another couple of months and then switch I guess.
but it's not modern, it's the same base NT code from the 90's
they just keep adding bloat to it.
sure it runs faster, the machines are faster now.
all new OS installs run faster i just smallerised my win7 partition and installed ubuntu 9, which runs so fast i can hardly see itphotonal wrote:From BBC WebSite : 'Many beta testers of Windows 7 have reported that it is faster than Vista, especially in terms of start-up and shutdown sequence of the computer.
Mr Curran said that the Microsoft Windows team had been poring over every aspect of the operating system to make improvements.
"We were able to shave 400 milliseconds off the shutdown time by slightly trimming the WAV file shutdown music.'
Wow, those Microsoft engineers certainly know there stuff!!! Optimise Windows 7 by editing the shutdown music!!!