You stated Mack was found without fault. Mack was Censured. You won't admit that your statement was false.
For being a insistent jack ass, your complete ignorance of the matter has taught me something priceless. I knew that DR. Mack had been ridiculously investigated & harassed for 14 months. I also knew that he had been found without fault(fact)and that he had all his academic freedoms as a result when the process was over. The mistake I made was the fact that I trusted your lame quick wiki research in the first place. It appears now that I have investigated the issue a bit further, that Mack may
have NEVER in fact received a formal censure at all. They sought to censure the old boy, but they could not find sufficient grounds for doing so and gave him a public warning instead. Egotistical bastards. It appears that you may in fact be entirely wrong without even a legitimate honest mistake to blame. The lesson I learned here was to pay closer attention to my own instincts, than others making ignorant, self entitled, grandiose claims. I have written the John E. Mack institute for a formal pin point understanding of the manner. I see that is where (as per usual) Wiki did their plagiarism from in the first place. I found no less than 5 other credible sources on the Internet that stated Mack never received a formal censure at all. Me go figure.
You stated. I do understand exactly how nuclear propulsion works <--- direct quote. Yet you refuse to back that up, because it was obviously just Internet braggadocio.
I guess this is just more self adulating jack ass praise.
Face facts friend, you are calling me a liar based on a hunch or a guess. Unless you can prove that I am incapable of understanding such a basic concept with respect to surface level functionality, you LOSE. Keep making yourself look like a moron. Like they say, if it feels good...
You state things as facts that are opinions at best. I gets you into debates that end up in flame wars quite often. sound familiar? :wink
Please copy and paste an example of me stating things as facts that are opinions at best.