Dither Options
-
- Posts: 3977
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:50 pm
- Location: Earth
Dither Options
Sup folks?
What dithering option do you all use... ive been reading a bit about it and a tad confused
What id the best POW setting to use for electronic music? is it POW-2?
What dithering option do you all use... ive been reading a bit about it and a tad confused
What id the best POW setting to use for electronic music? is it POW-2?
Re: Dither Options
i always use triangular dither - always seems to do good for me - haven't tried all the other options tho so can't really compare...
Re: Dither Options
I do everything in my sets at 44.1/16k so there is no need for dithering.
MBP | Live 9 Suite | Max for Live | Push | MOTU Ultralite | iPad | Analog Modular Synths | Moog Voyager
aka "Tempus3r" | Music | Blog | Twitter | Soundcloud
aka "Tempus3r" | Music | Blog | Twitter | Soundcloud
Re: Dither Options
I export Mixdowns at 32bit, and then Master as 16 pow-2
-
- Posts: 3977
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:50 pm
- Location: Earth
Re: Dither Options
nice. But can the human ear hear the different between 24 and 32 bit?re.mark wrote:I export Mixdowns at 32bit, and then Master as 16 pow-2
are you not just taking up a load of space?
Re: Dither Options
Im not too sure to be honest, just like to export at the highest possible. Mere personal preference.
Re: Dither Options
I use PowR-1 for quiet material like solo acoustic guitar, ambient, voice.
I use PowR-3 for loud material like electronic dance, rock/metal, or any mixes that have been strongly limited.
I use PowR-2 for things in between.
I use PowR-3 for loud material like electronic dance, rock/metal, or any mixes that have been strongly limited.
I use PowR-2 for things in between.
-
- Posts: 3977
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:50 pm
- Location: Earth
Re: Dither Options
users on here seem quite experienced so ill take your word for it.ethios4 wrote:I use PowR-1 for quiet material like solo acoustic guitar, ambient, voice.
I use PowR-3 for loud material like electronic dance, rock/metal, or any mixes that have been strongly limited.
I use PowR-2 for things in between.
going to test POWR-3.
experiment..
Re: Dither Options
I got my info from reading the manual, p. 47...
Perhaps I don't need to go as high as Pow-r 3 for everything loud...Ableton wrote: Dither Options - If you are rendering at a bit depth lower than 32-bit, choose one
of the dither modes. Dithering adds a small amount of noise to rendered audio, but
minimizes artifacts when reducing the bit depth. By default, Triangular is selected,
which is the safest mode to use if there is any possibility of doing additional processing
on your le. Rectangular mode introduces an even smaller amount of dither
noise, but at the expense of additional quantization error. The three Pow-r modes
offer successively higher amounts of dithering, but with the noise pushed above the
audible range. Note that dithering is a procedure that should only be applied once
to any given audio le. If you plan to do further processing on your rendered le, it’s
best to render to 32-bit to avoid the need for dithering at this stage. In particular, the
Pow-r modes should never be used for any material
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:31 pm
Re: Dither Options
While I'll admit that I may not have the best mastering ears in the world, I do think they're pretty decent. That said, I just did 3 exports of a track I just mastered with the 3 POW-r settings. The track is a house remix and has some pretty heavy compression and limiting on it. The differences between the dithering types are EXTREMELY minimal. What stuck out the most to me was a slight shift in the stereo field between the 3 bounces. I found, in this particular instance, that POW-r 3 retained the best stereo image and while there was maybe a tad more presence in the 16-18 kHz range, it wasn't enough to be offensive. As previously stated, try bounces of all 3 (or 5 if you include triangular and rectangular) options, turn on that exclusive solo mode, and check between them.
Re: Dither Options
This was posted on gearslutz, thought it was pretty funny:
Quoted from Logic manual:
"POW-r offers three distinct dithering modes.
• No Dithering: No dithering is applied.
• POW-r #1: uses a special dithering curve to minimize quantization noise.
• POW-r #2: (Noise Shaping): uses additional noise shaping over a wide frequency
range, which can extend the dynamic range by 5 to 10 dB.
• POW-r #3: (Noise Shaping): uses additional, optimized noise shaping which can
extend the dynamic range by 20 dB within the 2 to 4 kHz range—the range the
human ear is most sensitive to."
ProTools manual:
"The POW-r Dither plug-in provides three types
of noise shaping, each with its own characteris-
tics. Try each noise shaping type and choose the
one that adds the least amount of coloration to
the audio being processed.
Type 1 Has the flattest frequency spectrum in
the audible range of frequencies, modulating
and accumulating the dither noise just below
the Nyquist frequency. Recommended for less
stereophonically complex material such as solo
instrument recordings.
Type 2 Has a psychoacoustically optimized low
order noise shaping curve. Recommended for
material of greater stereophonic complexity.
Type 3 Has a psychoacoustically optimized high
order noise shaping curve. Recommended for
full-spectrum, wide-stereo field material."
Sonikmatter (from some old logic manual maybe?):
"POW-r #1 is optimized for low dynamic range program, such as highly
compressed pop music
POW-r #2 is optimized for less complex program, such as spoken word
POW-r #3 is optimized for complex, high dynamic range program, such
as orchestral performance"
Wikipedia:
"POW-R #1: optimized for simple program of average dynamic range, such as spoken word.
POW-R #2: optimized for low dynamic range program, such as rock music.
POW-R #3: optimized for complex, high dynamic range program, such as orchestral music."
Quoted from Logic manual:
"POW-r offers three distinct dithering modes.
• No Dithering: No dithering is applied.
• POW-r #1: uses a special dithering curve to minimize quantization noise.
• POW-r #2: (Noise Shaping): uses additional noise shaping over a wide frequency
range, which can extend the dynamic range by 5 to 10 dB.
• POW-r #3: (Noise Shaping): uses additional, optimized noise shaping which can
extend the dynamic range by 20 dB within the 2 to 4 kHz range—the range the
human ear is most sensitive to."
ProTools manual:
"The POW-r Dither plug-in provides three types
of noise shaping, each with its own characteris-
tics. Try each noise shaping type and choose the
one that adds the least amount of coloration to
the audio being processed.
Type 1 Has the flattest frequency spectrum in
the audible range of frequencies, modulating
and accumulating the dither noise just below
the Nyquist frequency. Recommended for less
stereophonically complex material such as solo
instrument recordings.
Type 2 Has a psychoacoustically optimized low
order noise shaping curve. Recommended for
material of greater stereophonic complexity.
Type 3 Has a psychoacoustically optimized high
order noise shaping curve. Recommended for
full-spectrum, wide-stereo field material."
Sonikmatter (from some old logic manual maybe?):
"POW-r #1 is optimized for low dynamic range program, such as highly
compressed pop music
POW-r #2 is optimized for less complex program, such as spoken word
POW-r #3 is optimized for complex, high dynamic range program, such
as orchestral performance"
Wikipedia:
"POW-R #1: optimized for simple program of average dynamic range, such as spoken word.
POW-R #2: optimized for low dynamic range program, such as rock music.
POW-R #3: optimized for complex, high dynamic range program, such as orchestral music."
tarekith
https://tarekith.com
https://tarekith.com
Re: Dither Options
Many different interpretations.
I always prefer type 2 on my music, I chose that by rendering 3 versioj using the 3 pow-r noise shaping dither types and asking some listeners. general consensus that drums seemed better defined with type 2...but frankly I couldnt hear much difference myself...
I always prefer type 2 on my music, I chose that by rendering 3 versioj using the 3 pow-r noise shaping dither types and asking some listeners. general consensus that drums seemed better defined with type 2...but frankly I couldnt hear much difference myself...
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Dither Options
Also worth mentioning is that you should avoid dithering more than once. If you'll send the material to a professional mastering house or plan to master yourself (as a separate step) it's best to avoid dithering before the final conversion.
Re: Dither Options
Type 2 for me as well most of the time. I'm not surprised people can't hear the difference, we're talking about a signal that's EXTREMELY quiet compared to the audio it's embedded in. Honestly I think people worry about dither way too much. It's a useful tool, but it's also probably the least significant part of the production process. People think it has a much great audible effect than it really does.
I'd be really surprised if 99.99% of people could hear a difference between a track with and without dither, unless they were playing something like crash cymbal or reverb tails at super high volumes in a super quiet studio.
I'd be really surprised if 99.99% of people could hear a difference between a track with and without dither, unless they were playing something like crash cymbal or reverb tails at super high volumes in a super quiet studio.
tarekith
https://tarekith.com
https://tarekith.com
Re: Dither Options
3phase = .01 percent.Tarekith wrote: I'd be really surprised if 99.99% of people could hear a difference between a track with and without dither, unless they were playing something like crash cymbal or reverb tails at super high volumes in a super quiet studio.