Lives sound engine argument again ...
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
I can't be arsed reading this whole thread so could someone summarise it for me in a couple of sentences please?
Link to any interesting stats or analysis please.
Ta.
Link to any interesting stats or analysis please.
Ta.
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
Let me summarize the entire thread for you:
And that pretty much sums it all up!
And that pretty much sums it all up!
"That which does not kill us makes us stronger..........."
-Friedrich Nietzsche-
-Friedrich Nietzsche-
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
^^^ what all the idiots that don't get that Live sounds shite?
hey, just pulling a leg here.
this thread is fun.
hey, just pulling a leg here.
this thread is fun.
*** GAFM ***
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 6:40 pm
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
Kb420 you are a fuckin genius! That is funny as fuck!
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
Tone Deft wrote: the people at Ableton have stated many many many many times that at a clip's original bpm the only warp mode that affects the audio is Complex and Complex Pro.
whatever you're hearing you're diagnosing it wrong.
Wow actually i just tested it quickly on live 7 here at work and you're right. All 3 of those warp modes sound the same as long as its at the right tempo. I tested it on a very short section of a song with many sustaining sounds and just set the loop to the correct tempo with only the one 1.1.1 warp marker.
So now that i think about it, it must've been the way that i had warped those old tunes which was the reason why I was hearing the flutter even at the correct tempo. That has to be what I was diagnosing wrong.
audiovoid.net
.............
Macbook pro,
MacPro 8 core
running OSX, &
WinXP through Bootcamp and Fusion
.............
Macbook pro,
MacPro 8 core
running OSX, &
WinXP through Bootcamp and Fusion
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
I did some testing on Live's "summing engine" between versions. Results here:
http://syncretia.net/wordpress/?p=65
Also, I wrote an article about how stupid it is to use the term "Sound Engine"
http://www.syncretia.com/wordpress/?p=53
PS: I recently realised that the images don't show up in some browsers
http://syncretia.net/wordpress/?p=65
Also, I wrote an article about how stupid it is to use the term "Sound Engine"
http://www.syncretia.com/wordpress/?p=53
PS: I recently realised that the images don't show up in some browsers
Download and listen @ http://www.syncretia.com
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
Ok. I've used Live for sometime now and produced tracks to 5 labels, so I have s fair understanding of Live. IMO.. The sound engine isn't great. For example listen to a clean sample that needs no EQ etc drag it into Live and immediately the sound has severely been altered. Why should a sound that is already processed and mastered need to be EQ and processed again? One if the few things that gets to me of with Live. I hate latency too LOL, but that's another topic.
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
Hmm, is this the transient attack of the Volvo slope assault? Probably.
and, sigh.
and, sigh.
-
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 2:54 am
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Last edited by ohigetbywithalittlehelpfrommyfriends on Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:22 am
- Contact:
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
Perhaps he didn't turn off the autowarp.
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
I just wish I could still see kb420's pic
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
I can't remember exactly which pic I posted, but it was probably something like this:eyeknow wrote:I just wish I could still see kb420's pic
"That which does not kill us makes us stronger..........."
-Friedrich Nietzsche-
-Friedrich Nietzsche-
Re: Lives sound engine argument again ...
a good resumé