Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
-
- Posts: 4336
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:08 pm
- Location: la
Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
my attorney will be contacting a few of you shortly
Ruling could let model find, sue online heckler
* Story Highlights
* Judge orders Google to hand over blogger's identifying information to woman
* Blogger had anonymously slammed model Liskula Cohen
* Judge: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
* Cohen's legal team intends to sue the blogger
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/08/18/new ... index.html
By Jason Kessler
CNN
NEW YORK (CNN) -- A model who was slammed with derogatory terms by an anonymous blogger has the right to learn the identity of her online heckler, a judge ruled.
In August 2008, a user of Blogger.com, Google's blogging service, created "Skanks in NYC," a site that assailed Liskula Cohen, 37, a Canadian-born onetime cover girl who has appeared in Vogue and other fashion magazines. The blog featured photos of Cohen captioned with terms including "psychotic," "ho," and "skank."
On Monday, New York Supreme Court Judge Joan Madden ruled that Google must hand over to Cohen any identifying information it possesses about the blog's creator.
Steven Wagner, Cohen's attorney, said Google complied with the ruling Tuesday evening, submitting to his legal team the creator's IP address and e-mail address. Only a valid e-mail address is required to register for a blog on Blogger.com.
Wagner said that once his legal team tracks the e-mail address to a name, the next step will be to sue Cohen's detractor for defamation. He said he suspected the creator of the blog is an acquaintance of Cohen.
The blog has not been operational for months.
The unidentified creator of the blog was represented in court by an attorney, Anne Salisbury, who said her client voluntarily took the blog down when Cohen initiated legal action against it.
Salisbury suggested that Cohen is more interested in attracting publicity than restoring her reputation. She contended her client's blog would have languished harmlessly in obscurity had Cohen not filed suit. The site had negligible traffic and only five posts on it, all written on a single day, she said.
In her ruling, the judge quoted a Virginia court that ruled in a similar case that nameless online taunters should be held accountable when their derision crosses a line.
"The protection of the right to communicate anonymously must be balanced against the need to assure that those persons who choose to abuse the opportunities presented by this medium can be made to answer for such transgressions," the judge said, quoting the Virginia decision.
Cohen's attorney said he was "happy that the court recognizes that the Internet is not a place where people can freely defame people."
But the blogger's attorney strongly disputed the judge's reasoning. Salisbury asserted that her client's invective was not unusual for the Internet, and that hyperbolic online name-calling is so rampant -- "in comments sections, on Twitter, on blogs" as to practically be part of the Web's DNA.
She warned that Monday's ruling has "potentially damaging implications for free speech on the Internet."
After the ruling, a Google spokesman expressed sympathy for targets of Internet insult-slinging, but said the company divulges user information only when ordered to do so by a court.
"We sympathize with anyone who may be the victim of cyberbullying. We also take great care to respect privacy concerns and will only provide information about a user in response to a subpoena or other court order," Google's Andrew Pederson said.
Ruling could let model find, sue online heckler
* Story Highlights
* Judge orders Google to hand over blogger's identifying information to woman
* Blogger had anonymously slammed model Liskula Cohen
* Judge: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
* Cohen's legal team intends to sue the blogger
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/08/18/new ... index.html
By Jason Kessler
CNN
NEW YORK (CNN) -- A model who was slammed with derogatory terms by an anonymous blogger has the right to learn the identity of her online heckler, a judge ruled.
In August 2008, a user of Blogger.com, Google's blogging service, created "Skanks in NYC," a site that assailed Liskula Cohen, 37, a Canadian-born onetime cover girl who has appeared in Vogue and other fashion magazines. The blog featured photos of Cohen captioned with terms including "psychotic," "ho," and "skank."
On Monday, New York Supreme Court Judge Joan Madden ruled that Google must hand over to Cohen any identifying information it possesses about the blog's creator.
Steven Wagner, Cohen's attorney, said Google complied with the ruling Tuesday evening, submitting to his legal team the creator's IP address and e-mail address. Only a valid e-mail address is required to register for a blog on Blogger.com.
Wagner said that once his legal team tracks the e-mail address to a name, the next step will be to sue Cohen's detractor for defamation. He said he suspected the creator of the blog is an acquaintance of Cohen.
The blog has not been operational for months.
The unidentified creator of the blog was represented in court by an attorney, Anne Salisbury, who said her client voluntarily took the blog down when Cohen initiated legal action against it.
Salisbury suggested that Cohen is more interested in attracting publicity than restoring her reputation. She contended her client's blog would have languished harmlessly in obscurity had Cohen not filed suit. The site had negligible traffic and only five posts on it, all written on a single day, she said.
In her ruling, the judge quoted a Virginia court that ruled in a similar case that nameless online taunters should be held accountable when their derision crosses a line.
"The protection of the right to communicate anonymously must be balanced against the need to assure that those persons who choose to abuse the opportunities presented by this medium can be made to answer for such transgressions," the judge said, quoting the Virginia decision.
Cohen's attorney said he was "happy that the court recognizes that the Internet is not a place where people can freely defame people."
But the blogger's attorney strongly disputed the judge's reasoning. Salisbury asserted that her client's invective was not unusual for the Internet, and that hyperbolic online name-calling is so rampant -- "in comments sections, on Twitter, on blogs" as to practically be part of the Web's DNA.
She warned that Monday's ruling has "potentially damaging implications for free speech on the Internet."
After the ruling, a Google spokesman expressed sympathy for targets of Internet insult-slinging, but said the company divulges user information only when ordered to do so by a court.
"We sympathize with anyone who may be the victim of cyberbullying. We also take great care to respect privacy concerns and will only provide information about a user in response to a subpoena or other court order," Google's Andrew Pederson said.
-
- Posts: 4336
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:08 pm
- Location: la
Re: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
Nebs can start the class action suit against b0unce
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 12:02 am
- Location: World Tour
Re: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
FUCK that....CPEREZZZ RULES !!!!
voted MOST POPULAR FORUM MEMBER 2009.
-
- Posts: 4336
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:08 pm
- Location: la
Re: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
i'm feeling harassed
-
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:18 pm
Re: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
This is REALLY starting to confuse the hell out of me! At this point I am not sure who's in more deep doo doo, DrXparaMental or Dr. Conrad Murray. Just today I got a strange PM here that had a link to this story in it and something about me having urgent oral sex very soon. It said something like DrX, your time has come, you're going down! I don't get it.
Re: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
Oral sex is urgent. Quite important.
Do you think you came to the right place?
I mean these new LCD monitors are good, but even the worst head would have to be better than trying to get noggin from a monitor.
Do you think you came to the right place?
I mean these new LCD monitors are good, but even the worst head would have to be better than trying to get noggin from a monitor.
-
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 11:08 am
- Location: Up in the Mountains NW of Alicante, Spain
Re: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
LOLZ.
Tears of joy running down my legs........
Ho ho ho fookin' ho!
Z.
Tears of joy running down my legs........
Ho ho ho fookin' ho!
Z.
-
- Posts: 7251
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:34 am
- Contact:
Re: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
at what point does blogging your thougghts become a thought crime?
It was as if someone shook up a 6 foot can of blood soda and suddenly popped the top.
Re: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
^ the moment you asked that question.
Re: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
pulsoc wrote:Nebs can start the class action suit against b0unce
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:09 pm
Re: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
^ shrieeeeeeeek
I would feel sorry for him if he wasn’t wearing a pink fuckin leotard and uh... frilly matador thingy.
That just makes me think he likes it.
I would feel sorry for him if he wasn’t wearing a pink fuckin leotard and uh... frilly matador thingy.
That just makes me think he likes it.
Re: Anonymous online taunters can be held accountable
Three months in prison: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 805567.ece - non-anonymous taunting...