LIVE 4 PERFORMANCE TEST

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Macrostructure
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 2:51 pm

Post by Macrostructure » Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:01 pm

FaX-01 wrote:
Macrostructure wrote:1) Ableton Live CPU Meter % (if it bounces around, please list the peak)
23%
2) Laptop/Desktop? Make/Model
Laptop/Sony Vaio B1XP
3) Operating System
XPSP2
4) CPU Make Model and Speed
Intel Pentium M 735 1.7GHz
5) Amount of Ram / Speed of Ram (if you know)
512Mb PC 2700 DDR SDRAM
6) Soundcard (Stock or add on?, usb/firewire/pci ?)
Echo Indigo DJ
7) Hard Disk Drive Speed (if you know)
4200

That's great results on a 1.7ghz Centrino I must say. :)
I could have quoted 21% but there were occassional blips to 23% and I am an honest kinda guy 8) Should have a result on the B3XP in two weeks, Pentium M 745 @ 1.8Ghz, I just had the B1XP on test. Shared graphics RAM too by the way :D , although only 74Mb of memory used by Live left plenty spare.

bytheriver
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:53 pm

Post by bytheriver » Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:19 pm

1) Ableton Live CPU Meter % 23 (19-22 most of the time)

2) Laptop/Desktop? Desktop, custom built.
3) Operating System Windows XP 32bit edition (for now)
4) CPU Make Model and Speed AMD 64 3000+
5) Amount of Ram / Speed of Ram 512mb/ DDR 400
6) Soundcard- Standard for now
7) Hard Disk Drive Speed 7200rpm, 8 meg cache, SATA2

Built it to use the hyper transport of the new AMD 939 socket chips, and it flys :D

DJ VAKIS
Posts: 2084
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 7:26 am
Location: MUNICH-GERMANY
Contact:

Post by DJ VAKIS » Sun Jul 24, 2005 5:12 pm

majestic wrote:
hambone1 wrote:Still dreaming about a G5 Powerbook that will do both... :D
Just wait 12 months and get a 4GHz dual-CPU Powerbook with Intel inside running OS X Leopard! The news is all very good, especially for those of us reliant on laptops.

Then why we sould buy Apple computers?i think is better to buy a pc with less money.If power books comes out with intel then why you have to spend money for an Apple?just get a pc less money better performans.
http://www.myspace.com/djvakis
http://mix2r.fm/audio/user/221


----------------------------------------
MacBookPro 13" Core 2 Duo 2.26Ghz 2GB
Live 8 -Operator -Sampler
AKAI LPD8-GENELEC 1029A-iPhone runing TouchOSC.

hambone1
Posts: 5346
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: Abu Dhabi

Post by hambone1 » Sun Jul 24, 2005 5:40 pm

You buy what you want.. it's a free world!

I used PCs for years before my day job forced me into Macs. I would never (never say never!) go back to PCs. The elegance, simplicity, stability and power of Tiger with Core Audio, MIDI and video make it work for me.

High-speed Intel will be the icing on the cake.

At the end of the day, it's just a box that does a job.

LOFA
Posts: 3365
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:10 pm

Post by LOFA » Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:59 am

Am I alone, or has anyone else noticed a particularly higher demand of cpu in Live 5 for operators?

I'm seeing 15-30% for each instance on my dual g5 2g PM. This is new, and really unnerving.

I was trying to figure out why one set was flipping up to 90+% and I discovered that one operator alone was draning about 45% of my cpu!

I hope this goes away!

Myth Healer
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 5:48 pm

My results

Post by Myth Healer » Tue Jul 26, 2005 2:57 pm

Pentium (R) 4 CPU 2Ghz / 1,000 RAM at 266mhz / XP professional

My performance was 46% on the cpu. I was suprised to see how low a performance I was getting out of my system.

bytheriver
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:53 pm

Re: My results

Post by bytheriver » Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:42 pm

Myth Healer wrote:Pentium (R) 4 CPU 2Ghz / 1,000 RAM at 266mhz / XP professional

My performance was 46% on the cpu. I was suprised to see how low a performance I was getting out of my system.

Sorry to say that sounds about right, my P4 2.43 peaks at 38 ish. The older P4 chips dont stand up very well against the newer intel and AMDs.

puRe
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 8:36 am
Location: Serbia
Contact:

Post by puRe » Tue Jul 26, 2005 11:23 pm

1) 19%
2) Apple Power Mac G5
3) OSX 10.4.2
4) 2x 2.7ghz
5) 2.5gb
6) Built-in/Digi002
7) S-ATA

majestic
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 1:55 pm
Location: Singapore
Contact:

Post by majestic » Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:05 am

DJ VAKIS wrote:
majestic wrote:
hambone1 wrote:Still dreaming about a G5 Powerbook that will do both... :D
Just wait 12 months and get a 4GHz dual-CPU Powerbook with Intel inside running OS X Leopard! The news is all very good, especially for those of us reliant on laptops.

Then why we sould buy Apple computers?i think is better to buy a pc with less money.If power books comes out with intel then why you have to spend money for an Apple?just get a pc less money better performans.
Because PCs won't be able to run OS X.

AdamJay
Posts: 4757
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Indianapolis, USA

Post by AdamJay » Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:06 am

LOFA wrote:Am I alone, or has anyone else noticed a particularly higher demand of cpu in Live 5 for operators?

I'm seeing 15-30% for each instance on my dual g5 2g PM. This is new, and really unnerving.

I was trying to figure out why one set was flipping up to 90+% and I discovered that one operator alone was draning about 45% of my cpu!

I hope this goes away!
make sure the "spread" parameter is at 0%
its a pretty cpu heavy parameter for just a chorusing effect.

many times you can cut Operator CPU usage almost in half by turning the "spread" all the way down/off.

hope this helps.

BTW, Live 5 Performance Test coming sooooon!

FaX-01
Posts: 1483
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 3:58 am

Post by FaX-01 » Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:40 am

AdamJay wrote: BTW, Live 5 Performance Test coming sooooon!
Will you be able to do the Live 5 test with just the Demo Version AdamJay ?
If so I'd be interested to see what my Toshi pulls off this time.
I've tried the demo aaaarrrggggggghhhhhhhhh the torment that is Live 5 :D .
CPU use seems far more efficient than version 4 from what I can see.
Particularly with just audio + effects and a few Simplers.
Very much like what they've done with the Simpler also.
Beat Repeat placed after an Operator rythmic patch yields some great glitchy electro rythmic moments.
Gotta love Voxengo Recorder :wink: .
Though I wish I hadn't given into temptation .
A taste of honey is definately worse than none at all.
Some money for the honey would be even sweeter :lol: .
My aren't the wings of butterflies beautiful and do they not make wonderful perturbations.....

DJRetard
Posts: 473
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:48 am

Post by DJRetard » Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:25 am

Why not use the Nine inch Nails track. Add a few plugs here and there. I think this would be a much closer to real life everyday studio situation type test.

Whatever happens with the live five test I would ike to see part of the test take in to account hard drive activity. Good idea no?. Well for PCs it is because everyone has all sorts of mother board configs, maybe some users are using scsi, one drive etc.

I also think the PC and Mac test shouldnt be in the same thread.


Just a thought.

Post Reply