SubFunk wrote:since when can you do that with v1 of serato?
Since the beginning. The Rane SL1 interface has a microphone input for this purpose.
I like this thread though, and I respect everyone's opinion.
I'm trying to collect all of the pros and cons that I can on these two platforms. Here's what I got (correct me if I'm wrong - I'll edit this post to add more info):
Traktor
Pros:
No dongles or proprietary hardware needed
Control up to 4 decks with timecode
Compatible with most MIDI controllers
Lots of effects (3 at a time in each deck?)
Built-in software mixer
Somewhat of a standard in Europe
Relatively inexpensive entry price (which explains the European thing - cheap bastards
)
Syncs to external programs
The new Kontrol X1 controller looks really nice
Cons:
You need to pay $$$ for new versions
Manufacturer's reputation leaves a little to be desired
Not a club standard in the United States
Waveforms do not give frequency information
No Ableton collaboration
Serato
Pros:
All software upgrades are free for life
Actively collaborating with Ableton's developers on The Bridge
Control up to 4 decks with timecode (with version 2.0, in public beta now)
Waveforms show bass, mids, and treble as different colors
Built-in SP6 sample player (which can be used as 6 decks)
Rane interfaces are standard equipment found in most US clubs
Serato is a small company dedicated to making music software
Still as stable as Live 4.1.4
Runs like a champ on netbooks and underpowered computers
Optional video VJing plug-in available
Cons
Proprietary hardware required
Expensive entry-level price ($540 USD)
No software mixer in Scratch Live (not an issue for ITCH)
Scratch Live requires an external mixer (ITCH does not)
Slower pace of development
Limited MIDI controller support
There is something inherently goofy about the Numark NS7