The Maschine & Ableton Love Thread ;) [upon user request]

[x0b]

had my maschine a couple of days, i don't think it's gonna be for me really. i'm experiencing all kinds of sample import related woes, it's so clunky and slow to be able to use your own sounds with this thing (select them on the hardware, not the software).

[lukas412]

had my maschine a couple of days, i don't think it's gonna be for me really. i'm experiencing all kinds of sample import related woes, it's so clunky and slow to be able to use your own sounds with this thing (select them on the hardware, not the software).

You're doing it wrong. Take your time. Tag your samples. It's great.

Luke

[starving student]

actually it's very fast, and although there can always be improvement it's got a leg up on any competition at the moment, for instance I'd prefer audition in place on the hardware instead of audition in use, but then there is already audition in place on the software but who wants to use the software when you're using maschine

[martin808]

I've had my machine only a few days as well. I really like it and the workflow. I just wish i could sit and jam away, changing patterns, muting and soloing, changing parameters etc. and be able to record these events. either in ableton or in maschine, kind of like recording your set in live from session in to arrangement. I know there's a workaround for recording the events in to ableton (I haven't been able to get it to work yet) but it just seems like it's such an important part that's missed. It's doing my head in as i can create loads of good stuff jamming away but I don't want the only way of capturing this to be as audio.

[x0b]

had my maschine a couple of days, i don't think it's gonna be for me really. i'm experiencing all kinds of sample import related woes, it's so clunky and slow to be able to use your own sounds with this thing (select them on the hardware, not the software).

You're doing it wrong. Take your time. Tag your samples. It's great.

Luke

Care to share the right way to do it then?

[x0b]

had my maschine a couple of days, i don't think it's gonna be for me really. i'm experiencing all kinds of sample import related woes, it's so clunky and slow to be able to use your own sounds with this thing (select them on the hardware, not the software).

You're doing it wrong. Take your time. Tag your samples. It's great.

Luke

Care to share the right way to do it then?

http://www.native-instruments.com/forum ... p?t=107974

[delicioso]

i'm experiencing all kinds of sample import related woes, it's so clunky and slow to be able to use your own sounds with this thing (select them on the hardware, not the software).

Not sure why you would say that. I've never had any problems importing my own sounds and it's super quick. You can browse your sounds via the DISK tab in the browser panel, shift select to select all the sounds you want to import at once and click Import, then apply existing tags or make your own tag. Done. You can now browse and find sounds faster than anything.

[x0b]

my sample library is huge, it would take me days to go through and tag everything with meaningful tags.

it takes ages to scan every file in a folder when you import that folder. i'm not gonna sit there and scan and tag a 250gb+ sample library.

you should be able to browse disk directories direct from maschine instead of having to do this backwards tagging nonsense that forces you to catalog your samples.

[starving student]

this backwards tagging nonsense that forces you to catalog your samples.

classic

[Lazos]

Another question for Maschine heads:

How does it do with handling odd meters (5/8, 7/8, 11/8, etc)?

I suppose hosting it in Live, it might not matter much, since with Live you can change time signature via scene selection. I'm just curious how Maschine approaches this (or not) on its own.

[Ben_Binary]

my sample library is huge, it would take me days to go through and tag everything with meaningful tags.

it takes ages to scan every file in a folder when you import that folder. i'm not gonna sit there and scan and tag a 250gb+ sample library.

you should be able to browse disk directories direct from maschine instead of having to do this backwards tagging nonsense that forces you to catalog your samples.

My sample library is also massive... does maschine need to scan the samples only once?
or each time you want to browse?

[starving student]

once, and if you move them it's not a prob either, just rescan the drive once

[x0b]

this backwards tagging nonsense that forces you to catalog your samples.

classic

i know you fanboys won't hear a bad word said against it, but none of you can offer any advice as to what i'm doing wrong, just smarmy comments.

my sample library is already organised the way i want it, maschine forces me to do it all again the way it wants it.

[glitchrock-buddha]

I'm not crazy about the whole tagging thing either. Would rather direct browsing.

[delicioso]

my sample library is already organised the way i want it, maschine forces me to do it all again the way it wants it.

If your gigantic library is at least somewhat organized in the way you want it, what's the problem with importing large sections at a time that pertain to your way of organization and making a tag for them that applies to how you like to have them organized?

Anyway, I'm glad I don't need 250GB+ sample library to make music.