Post
by chrysalis33rpm » Sun Nov 14, 2004 6:52 pm
Interesting thread. Definitely an important topic of discussion for the people actually into making and playing the sounds/music, that would be us.
My 2 cents: I try and keep it simple in talking about genres- just enough to get me to the right record bin at the store: I hear hip hop, house, breaks, drum'n'bass, downtempo...and 'electronica'.
I tell people I spin downtempo and funky breaks, because it's a short answer, and its more true than not true.
The term 'electronica' is problematic, but it's also useful because, to those in the know, it doesn't force too much specificity on a given song structure...we all know that a hip hop beat can happily morph into a d+b beat and back, same for house and breaks.
I don't get it, people who specialize so intently on one sub-genre of house or trance, give me a break. Formulaic music is dumb whether it is made in Hollywood or by an indie label.
'Electronic' music is accurate but also unspecific...one of the bigger problem's with the public's conception of 'electronic' music is that they expect computer generated bleeps and squeaks. As we know, electronic music may sample live instruments and be very warm, lush and rounded...or not...
I think electronic music invites, encourages, and needs to be thought of as a field, a field with no boundaries, but instead different textures, areas, and patterns of intensity which all bleed into and reverberate off of one another. I think many people in this thread are reacting against the tendency to divide this field, to wall it off from other parts of itself. Because we know that this, the field of electronic music, feeds on and is stimulated by all music and all sound ever emitted, ever perceived, ever recorded.
That's what I think.