What Ableton IS KEEPING SECRET about Live's audio engine...
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:45 pm
The quality of the output is related to the ability of the user!
doghouse wrote:There's nothing wrong with Ableton's audio engine. Few people doing electronic music (which is what most Live users do) push the limits of the audio quality of any of the DAWs, even everyone's favorite whipping boys Fruity Loops and Reason. Now if you need to record classical music in a great sounding hall with $$$$$$ mikes you should be more picky about your DAW's audio performance.
The reason that ProTools and Cubase/Nuendo have so much of the pro market locked up has to do with things completely unrelated to any drastically superior audio quality and everything to do with who was in the market first and catered to the needs of pro users who could afford the very expensive hardware needed at the time to run the software.
People have, and of course it always nulls. Then arguments start saying "oh, well if you had done it this way..." or "well, the test is flawed because of x,y,z"Figgy wrote:I'd love to hear someone actually post an A B test, I've heard a lot of claims without ANY proof.
timothyallan wrote:People have, and of course it always nulls. Then arguments start saying "oh, well if you had done it this way..." or "well, the test is flawed because of x,y,z"Figgy wrote:I'd love to hear someone actually post an A B test, I've heard a lot of claims without ANY proof.
It really never ends.
Agree.tlennon wrote:The ubiquitous and never-ending saga of which is better than ..... I certainly wish people would put this debate to rest. FINALLY!
i also agree.tlennon wrote:The ubiquitous and never-ending saga of which is better than ..... I certainly wish people would put this debate to rest. FINALLY!