Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Discussion of music production, audio, equipment and any related topics, either with or without Ableton Live
crofter
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 3:35 pm
Location: The foot of our stairs

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by crofter » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:52 pm

Tone Deft wrote:
crofter wrote:
Tone Deft wrote::lol: another Pros only thread.

Best of luck with the rant! :D. Kill Kill Kill!!!
A real pro would have a backup system so it wouldn't be a problem, I have and I'm only a fucking amateur.
dum's not gonna like that. 8O
I'm sure he'll make his feelings known.
Core2 quad q660, 4gig ram, Win 7 home premium SP1.
P4 2.8 ghz, Gigabyte GA- 81E2004P, 1.5 gig ram,XP Home, SP3.
dual core pentium laptop 2 gig ram Win 8.
MOTU 8Pre,Tascam FW-1804,Zoom R16, Ableton live 8.4
Cubase 7

ShelLuser
Posts: 3883
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Wageningen, Netherlands

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by ShelLuser » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:57 pm

Darn, always when I'm out of popcorn! :mrgreen:
With kind regards,

Peter

Using the 'Power' Trio: Live 10 Suite (+ Push & Max 8 ), Reason 10 and Maschine Mk3 (+ the ultimate Komplete 12).
Blog: SynthFan (under heavy construction!)

Tone Deft
Posts: 23565
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:19 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by Tone Deft » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:57 pm

LOL for real...

he's tough on the outside but onside he really is quite emotional.

FWIW this amateur just ordered a new PC as I wait for it to arrive on the 20th I'll send Ableton an e-mail asking for more registrations. I don't know if I'm at my limit but that's my amateur plan.
oddstep wrote:I agree with all of this. I'm just bored of writing "its music, just listen and trust your judgement"

stringtapper
Posts: 6272
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by stringtapper » Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:07 pm

Tone Deft wrote:LOL for real...

he's tough on the outside but onside he really is quite emotional.

FWIW this amateur just ordered a new PC as I wait for it to arrive on the 20th I'll send Ableton an e-mail asking for more registrations. I don't know if I'm at my limit but that's my amateur plan.
Pffft! People working to deadlines don't have time for this type of preparation.
Unsound Designer

tw1nstates
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:00 pm

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by tw1nstates » Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:09 pm

real pro's don't use ableton anyway, everhybodyz knoz proz use pro toolz.

That's why it's called pro toolz, cos ittz pro.
I slipped into a daze, whilst I was there I heard the most startling music, it was at once familiar and alien, reassuring and unsettling.
https://soundcloud.com/fearoftherave

Tone Deft
Posts: 23565
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:19 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by Tone Deft » Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:19 pm

stringtapper wrote:
Tone Deft wrote:LOL for real...

he's tough on the outside but onside he really is quite emotional.

FWIW this amateur just ordered a new PC as I wait for it to arrive on the 20th I'll send Ableton an e-mail asking for more registrations. I don't know if I'm at my limit but that's my amateur plan.
Pffft! People working to deadlines don't have time for this type of preparation.
tell me about it. we're supposed to ship a project first of the year. my new work machine came in last week and there's no way I'd have the time to install the suite of Mentor Graphics CAD tools. so Engineering Services is doing it for me, it will take them until Monday.

oh well, I'm sitting on the sun @SF Civic Center waiting for jury duty. No popcorn allowed inside.
oddstep wrote:I agree with all of this. I'm just bored of writing "its music, just listen and trust your judgement"

dum
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:51 pm

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by dum » Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:26 pm

Sherlock Holmes wrote:rant.
No shit sherlock!

But there is also the opportunity to clear something up re: offline authorisation.

But ya, given that I'm ranting, you must surely assume I'm running a pirated copy given your previous nonsensical observations on that topic.

mihai wrote:either way i always assumed that the software scans for something more consistent than an hdd, like the motherboard id no. or something, in order to render itself as "used" but of course i could be completely off. hope whatever problems you're having end up working out fast though. best of luck.
it doesn't.
fisto wrote:Well, its clearly a fault from ableton's side. I've used up all my autz on one machine, because i changed some settings and new hardware. It's funnyto start up your computer after some tuning/upgrading and find your copy of of live in demO-mode. Really really bad!
It would also be in the abes interest to tie the aut-system to the motherboard, to keep better control of authorizations.
Just my add.
Cheers
exactly!
cotdagoo wrote:however there's always the issues you can't schedule - and i think that's a big part about what this thread is attempting to address.

i've had both a onboard video card die, had a pci network card die at random and it's been a pretty simple process to remedy as i've got spare parts from over the years. but again, this is only part of the problem when you take ableton live into account.

i can replace my faulty hardware, disable broken onboard devices through the bios and have a perfectly working system. it's only when i launch ableton that it becomes an issue, and i have to take the time to either get an internet connection established (which i really don't want on my main DAW) or email support and ask for another unlock if i've met my limit, which again leaves the easiest method for authorization being an internet connection after i've got an additional unlock.

none of my plugins ever require this, nor any other software installed on my system unless the registry entries which stored the registration data were removed/corrupted for some reason (hasn't happened yet).

like i said, i haven't had any 'real' issues.. but at the same time i can clearly see the problems at hand for someone who is working on a deadline or time sensitive material and has something horrible happen where they have to replace a piece of hardware at an inopportune time for ableton to supply extra unlocks - (ie: over the weekend).

just seems odd when you never run into this sort of problem with any other software. would make a lot more sense (to me at least) to use something like a hardware id that's tied to the motherboard (something that most users won't swap out or replace in their computer's lifetime). then if your hardware does crap out, you don't have to spend the time explaining your situation, and asking for another unlock.

edit: if you haven't ever had to ask for more unlocks/authorizations imo your opinion is worthless on this subject.
agreed. In this case there was no planning, LIVE and solely LIVE corrupted it's copy protection out of the blue. Not what I'm complaining about, although it's certainly one experience that helps shape my opinions on the current auth system.
Tone Deft wrote::lol: another Pros only thread.

Best of luck with the rant! :D. Kill Kill Kill!!!
It's not a pros only thread, it's for folks who work to deadlines.
That you don't see the distinction between the two speaks VOLUMES.
Or was it because I use the word hobbyists ? either way you're wearing your heart on your sleeve chump.
crofter wrote: A real pro would have a backup system so it wouldn't be a problem, I have and I'm only a fucking amateur.
Hi,
You said ableton were generous with their auths earlier. You never got around to defining generous, probably because you know 'generous' isn't what they are.

I have a backup system btw, thanks for your concern.

Tone Deft wrote:LOL for real...

he's tough on the outside but onside he really is quite emotional.

FWIW this amateur just ordered a new PC as I wait for it to arrive on the 20th I'll send Ableton an e-mail asking for more registrations. I don't know if I'm at my limit but that's my amateur plan.
Troll...
I talk about deadlines and you get real defensive about that. Calling Freud, come in Freud.

stringtapper wrote: Pffft! People working to deadlines don't have time for this type of preparation.
Oh look, they come in packs.

Where'd you get your crystal ball ? Let me know, so next time I'll email Ableton well in advance of LIVE corrupting it's protection scheme out of the blue.

Besides, I have a backup. That doesn't make the current auth system any better. Am I grieving here about what happened to me ? Nope. Just saying the current system is a load of shit.

And it is. That's why none of you jagoffs have yet made any kind of argument to the contrary.

Tone Deft wrote: tell me about it. we're supposed to ship a project first of the year. my new work machine came in last week and there's no way I'd have the time to install the suite of Mentor Graphics CAD tools. so Engineering Services is doing it for me, it will take them until Monday.

oh well, I'm sitting on the sun @SF Civic Center waiting for jury duty. No popcorn allowed inside.

*yawn*

You're a nob man. Same shit, different day. You do this shit all the time, troll a thread and then engage in some breezy off-topic exchange with one of your trolling cohorts.
If it's not that, it's the monday blues. If you're going to troll try and mix it up a bit.




Fanboys: lowering standards since 2001
Pasha wrote:Thanks dum for being so precise.

ShelLuser
Posts: 3883
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Wageningen, Netherlands

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by ShelLuser » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:00 am

Cool, 1st answer is to me!

I feel so much better now :)


Alas; pirate? Nah, I think you simply lack comparison material.

Things can get a lot worse; like being unable to run 2 versions of 1 program besides each other (for comparison, or having a safety net) without having to re-auth every time you start up the other version.

Having the option to either use a dongle or auth. through Internet. Dongles are nice on laptops when doing live gigs (not!).

Or having no other option but to use a dongle (granted; so far I've only come across this on software which you wouldn't often use in a live performance).

What about using 2 programs which each use a dongle for copy protection yet from different firms. Nice; 2 dongles on 1 laptop.


Bottom line; copy protection will always suck for licensed users, one way or the other. Still, out of all I've seen and experienced so far I think Live's is one of the more flexible ones out there. No doubt this is because Live is also focusing itself on live usage on gigs and such.

Sure; my Winrar license is way more flexible than that of Live. But when comparing the amount I paid for Live vs. that of Winrar (also an excellent piece of software IMO) I kinda can imagine why this is so.

But you know what they say... Its elementary my dear Watson, errrr, dum.
With kind regards,

Peter

Using the 'Power' Trio: Live 10 Suite (+ Push & Max 8 ), Reason 10 and Maschine Mk3 (+ the ultimate Komplete 12).
Blog: SynthFan (under heavy construction!)

Tone Deft
Posts: 23565
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:19 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by Tone Deft » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:12 am

you really have to lighten up. you try to read my posts like they're tea leaves. creepy. so much hate, poor child. poor emotional Professional Child. I am in the midst of some re-registers at home and at work, that's all you can write?

nobody's reading this thread to learn about Live Registration. they're reading it to watch you fight with people. we're posting in it to watch you react. thanks for the LOLZ and another witty nickname.

it is possible to complain without being shitty about it. a lot of people stop reading threads when it's author turns to be a douche. you're doing your cause wrong because you can't control yourself.
oddstep wrote:I agree with all of this. I'm just bored of writing "its music, just listen and trust your judgement"

Machinesworking
Posts: 11105
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by Machinesworking » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:25 am

Threads where people complain about the authorization method Ableton uses always go south, whether dum starts them or not.
I have yet to see one fully civilized thread about it. :|

Machinesworking
Posts: 11105
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by Machinesworking » Fri Sep 10, 2010 12:31 am

BTW yeah, their system is weird, the key is to always ask for a replacement authorization every time you use one on a new computer, OS, anything really.
I'm cheating though, I learned to do that because I was proving to some chump once that defragged clean instals without other languages etc. do not give your computer more CPU power or noticeable track count increases in OSX. Guy worked for a reputable music rag even... In the process it dawned on me to safe rather than sorry. Also, logic board authorizations can be a pita if your logic board dies, no purely awesome copy protection scheme exists beyond the weakest protection there is, a simple serial number.

dum
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:51 pm

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by dum » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:00 am

Sherlock wrote: Bottom line; copy protection will always suck for licensed users, one way or the other. Still, out of all I've seen and experienced so far I think Live's is one of the more flexible ones out there. No doubt this is because Live is also focusing itself on live usage on gigs and such.
nonsense.

I already described a better system, a challenge code that's generated via the motherboard. Plenty of audio apps I use employ this system. It's a comparatively brilliant system. Simple, sensible, considerate, accessible 24/7.

Have any of you even tried the offline mode ? it's just as fast as the online mode.
you go to http://www.ableton.com/unlock and it generates a response txt file immediately.

Their whole system can stay the way it is, conceptually, all they need to do is use the motherboard as a constant in the equation and generate the challenge from that. They choose not to It's a load of balls.


Troll Deft, you don't have anything to contribute here so just fuck off or offer an argument one way or the other. No one takes you seriously since you trolled everyone complaining about Live8 crashes, and 'coincidentally' only reported experiencing a crash after the 'quality' statement. You have zero credibility.
Pasha wrote:Thanks dum for being so precise.

ShelLuser
Posts: 3883
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Wageningen, Netherlands

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by ShelLuser » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:25 am

dum wrote:I already described a better system, a challenge code that's generated via the motherboard.
Sorry dude, I stopped taking you seriously a long time ago.

You have complains about a certain copy right scheme but can't be arsed to give the offline mode a try yourself? Puhlease.

In your first post you said (quote:) "I use other software that employs a system similar to abletons, but any time I've had to request another auth I got a speedy 'no problem'". Of course without sharing what kind of software. Would be nice to be able and compare the warez availability of software X in comparison to that of Live. In fact; it would benefit a serious discussion a lot to actually have something to comment on but of course that's not the intent here.

Yeah, when other people give examples like that (even when they're bloody obvious) you want them to spell it out for you; can't be bothered to check stuff out yourself so it seems. Yet when you try to make a point it becomes perfectly acceptable to use smoke screens.

Dude; trolling is boring. Its like Tone said; people stop taking you seriously and you only start getting snobby responses to provoke a reaction. Yeah; I did as well in this thread at first (and had a good laugh too, but alas). Maybe stuff like that floats your boat, I dunno, but its sure a waste of potential. You can do better than that. Try to take things a little more serious for a change.

EDIT:

Ok, lemme rig up a serious response one final time.

PS: as to why.. Your "perfect" system in fact kinda sucks donkey piss since its in fact very easy to write a simple driver which acts as an interface to any kinds of "info" requests between motherboard ('mobo') and the OS. A perfect example to that are the (for example) 'lspci' or 'lsusb' programs on Linux. Your 'brilliant' solution would actually make things a whole lot easier to copy.

There are a few fixed items which you can grab from a mobo. So its not that hard to copy this info. Then just load 'm into said driver which only has to intersect a few (documented!, even easier) bios interrupts and you're home free.

Been here, done this.

8086/8088 User Manual; ISBN: 1-55512-081-4

Sure, this is an old thingie. You'd be surprised how hard companies like Intel and AMD cling to 'backwards compatibility' because they frickin' have to. You want 5-13, 6-170, 6-188 and probably 7-6 and beyond.

Hope you had fun, this is very possibly the last serious comment I'm writing to any of your posts.
Last edited by ShelLuser on Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
With kind regards,

Peter

Using the 'Power' Trio: Live 10 Suite (+ Push & Max 8 ), Reason 10 and Maschine Mk3 (+ the ultimate Komplete 12).
Blog: SynthFan (under heavy construction!)

dum
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:51 pm

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by dum » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:30 am

Machinesworking wrote:Also, logic board authorizations can be a pita if your logic board dies, no purely awesome copy protection scheme exists beyond the weakest protection there is, a simple serial number.

seriously ?
I mean, ....seriously ?

What will you come out with next ? "Life can be a pita if you get a brain haemorrhage" ?


Of all the fuckin maintenance scenarios that might thwart a copy-protection scheme, replacing a motherboard/logic board HAS to be the least frequent one.

Kill yourself.
Pasha wrote:Thanks dum for being so precise.

dum
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:51 pm

Re: Abletons Unprofessional Authorisation system-Online/Offline

Post by dum » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:38 am

ShelLuser wrote:
dum wrote:I already described a better system, a challenge code that's generated via the motherboard.
Sorry dude, I stopped taking you seriously a long time ago.

You have complains about a certain copy right scheme but can't be arsed to give the offline mode a try yourself? Puhlease.
English isn't your strong point. I have used the offline mode. I asked if any of YOU have used it.
ShelLuser wrote: In your first post you said (quote:) "I use other software that employs a system similar to abletons, but any time I've had to request another auth I got a speedy 'no problem'". Of course without sharing what kind of software. Would be nice to be able and compare the warez availability of software X in comparison to that of Live. In fact; it would benefit a serious discussion a lot to actually have something to comment on but of course that's not the intent here.
Audio applications. What else ? I'm hardly talking about microsoft word.
If you wanted to know what other applications, you only had to ask. Obviously your intent here is simply to be contrary to me. I'm criticising Ableton afterall.
ShelLuser wrote: Yeah, when other people give examples like that (even when they're bloody obvious) you want them to spell it out for you; can't be bothered to check stuff out yourself so it seems. Yet when you try to make a point it becomes perfectly acceptable to use smoke screens.
huh ?
ShelLuser wrote: Dude; trolling is boring. Its like Tone said; people stop taking you seriously and you only start getting snobby responses to provoke a reaction. Yeah; I did as well in this thread at first (and had a good laugh too, but alas). Maybe stuff like that floats your boat, I dunno, but its sure a waste of potential. You can do better than that. Try to take things a little more serious for a change.
You had a laugh ? about copy protection ? Really ? sad.


None of you jagoffs came in here to offer a counter argument. You have none.
The thread was completely on topic until troll deft started and the rest of you joined him.
Pasha wrote:Thanks dum for being so precise.

Post Reply