scutheotaku wrote:Yeah, like I said - if you're just using straight loops and that's your track, then I agree. But still, there are creative ways to use loops, AND using one or two loops as a background point (like a shaker loop or something) does not make the entire song "uncreative"3phase wrote:jamief wrote:Andy Warhol. One of the biggest visual samplers in the art World. Er cough cough !
warhol did his own samples and havent bought them from somebody else..
come on lamers. you really cant sell the use of prerecorded loops as an creative act..
its a croach for your missing skills and you know that
nobody would damn you for a little percussion loop in the background.. but there are many loops out there that give the complete feeling of a track and you just have to arrange the loops.. the magix music maker is famous for that.. or garage band... i would say the users of premade sample loops know damn well where the musical idea in their "track" comes from... when it just would be elements one can remove without damaging the song they wouldnt defend the loop libs so much...
but also the use of percussion loops.. why you dont make your own one? dont sounds drinving enough than?
so you allready cheat on the groove design by using beat loops.. the beat dont makes a track? depends on the genre..
on a pop ballad one hardly can argue that the beat is not very originial ..its just not important..
however if you would get signed with theese ballad the first thing the producer would do is to order a real drummer and rerecord the stuff.
especially in genres where the drums are not the main attraction its the first thing they do..while in the electronic dance styles you can use generic drumloops loops to have a good production?
not really...