The obvious question: mu vs touchable

Discussion of music production, audio, equipment and any related topics, either with or without Ableton Live
Adonis
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:47 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: The obvious question: mu vs touchable

Post by Adonis » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:12 pm

[djadonis206]

...and TouchAble gives you feedback on more clip information than just the name. TouchAble tells you the play position, Mu for Lemur doesn't.

Also, the TouchAble layout is better. You can swap mixer controls from either the top or bottom while the mixer remains on the bottom in Mu for Lemur. This slows you down when you're trying to fly around the app.

These are not deal breakers just differences that make a difference

db120
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 7:35 pm

Re: The obvious question: mu vs touchable

Post by db120 » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:19 pm

Thanks for that, my gut was telling me to just stick with Touchable, got curious after seeing a couple people rave about MU though.

Adonis
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:47 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: The obvious question: mu vs touchable

Post by Adonis » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:42 pm

That XYZ pad in TouchAble is off the hook too! I haven't seen anything like that in Mu for Lemur.

Post Reply