I think Pink Floyd have never gone 64 bit. All their records suck.H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.
Pink Floyd were infinite bit as it was all analogue. That's why their laptop never goes down and ruins the show.Simon12345 wrote:I think Pink Floyd have never gone 64 bit. All their records suck.H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.
Well the old 8bit ones have some kind of interesting texture.
So you are basically telling us that you've got at your home all the instruments, synths, outboard gear, that they had during the recording of their albums, and you can record them and play them directly instead of sampling them ? impressive!H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.
H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.
Simon12345 wrote:I think Pink Floyd have never gone 64 bit. All their records suck.H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.
Well the old 8bit ones have some kind of interesting texture.
Piplodocus wrote:Pink Floyd were infinite bit as it was all analogue. That's why their laptop never goes down and ruins the show.Simon12345 wrote:I think Pink Floyd have never gone 64 bit. All their records suck.H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.
Well the old 8bit ones have some kind of interesting texture.
H20nly wrote:yeah, i'm not sure what that crap has to do with 64 bit.
64 BIT
Well I think it is still very on-topic =) (also we dodged a recursive loop which could have crashed this forum by a few).H20nly wrote:^ no. i basically said:
H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.
doom_Oo7 wrote:Well I think it is still very on-topic =) (also we dodged a recursive loop which could have crashed this forum by a few).H20nly wrote:^ no. i basically said:
H20nly wrote:yeah all of Pink Floyd's albums sucked before they got 64 bit. you can totally tell when Daft Punk got it too.
You seem to mean that ranting about no 64 bit is pointless because others have done well without 64 bit.
What I wanted to say is that they had actually FAR LESS restrictions, in time, gear, musical instruments, than most of us solo home-studists with a 49 key keyboard and a m-audio soundcard. And 32 bit is another one of these restrictions...
And 8-bit music is pretty cool, but if you want to make an orchestral arrangement of the composition / recording of a progressive metal band with 7 guitars 3 drumkits 2 basses and 45 synths , you don't go the atari st way...
tell us more about the lack of support pleasetintala wrote:not having 64 bit is seriously screwing up my workflow!!! I have 64 bit plugins, 64 bit OS, w -7 , everything 64 bit........... even REASON is 64 BIT!!!!You hear that Abelton ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, REASON IS 64 BIT!...... I am seriously thinking about flushing Live down the shitter. It crashes constantly and no support whatsoever.