A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Discussion of music production, audio, equipment and any related topics, either with or without Ableton Live
Post Reply
jellycaster
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:15 pm
Location: London

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by jellycaster » Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:26 pm

bouncing

antarktika
Posts: 1006
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:54 am

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by antarktika » Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:37 pm

Which you can also do non-destructively by right/ctrl clicking on your track and choosing "freeze track" which gives you the option of unfreezing it later to change compression settings or adjust other variables" :wink:

...of course, in that case it will be called "freezing".

simmerdown
Posts: 3761
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:36 pm
Location: Northwest Nowhere

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by simmerdown » Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:02 pm

...then you have to flatten to get audio

this would be refered to to as Freeze/Flatten

flatten seems to give a better cpu bump than just freezing...to be verified

simmerdown
Posts: 3761
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:36 pm
Location: Northwest Nowhere

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by simmerdown » Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:18 pm

i just find freeze/flatten a faster way to get midi>>audio...you dont have to rec, wait for it, possibly have to trim, etc...

mihai
Posts: 729
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:46 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by mihai » Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:39 pm

simmerdown wrote:i just find freeze/flatten a faster way to get midi>>audio...you dont have to rec, wait for it, possibly have to trim, etc...
when flattening, the audio you end up with is in 32 bit format whereas if you record from a track the recorded audio will be at the settings specified in the audio preferences.
usually higher bit rate audio files will put more strain on the cpu. just a related factoid.

yur2die4
Posts: 6530
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 3:02 am
Location: Menasha, Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by yur2die4 » Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:19 am

Did someone say bouncing?

I'll categorize this one into 'threads that make me wish I had a girlfriend'.

timothyallan
Posts: 5788
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by timothyallan » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:44 am

Hey this is supposed to be serious, I'm serious.

timothyallan
Posts: 5788
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by timothyallan » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:27 am

Seriously.

Machinesworking
Posts: 11130
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by Machinesworking » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:37 am

timothyallan wrote:Image
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

timothyallan
Posts: 5788
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by timothyallan » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:39 am

Machinesworking wrote:
timothyallan wrote:Image
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Seriously.

simmerdown
Posts: 3761
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:36 pm
Location: Northwest Nowhere

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by simmerdown » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:40 pm

a thread in this forum went OT? thats friggn shocking, scandalous!

dday
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:22 pm

Re: A serious Question from NETBOOKJOEY

Post by dday » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:46 pm

jellycaster wrote:bouncing

co-sign.

Post Reply