Or this.....beatmunga wrote:
Who would you trust ????
Or this.....beatmunga wrote:
mendeldrive wrote:NOBODY designs their own sounds... There is ZERO point in reinventing the wheel.
LoopStationZebra wrote:it's like a hipster commie pinko manifesto. Rambling. Angry. Nearly divorced from all reality; yet strangely compelling with a ring of truth.
So finally someone posting headphones which make Beats shine, or even iPod ear buds. DT 100 - the worst headphones ever made, ever seen in the studios - good isolation, low price and the most dreadful sound in the history of audio industry.beatmunga wrote:There's only 1 industry standard headphone. Made by Beyer.
DT100s.
I bet you have a pair of Beats, Ricky Ray.rikhyray wrote:So finally someone posting headphones which make Beats shine, or even iPod ear buds. DT 100 - the worst headphones ever made, ever seen in the studios - good isolation, low price and the most dreadful sound in the history of audio industry.beatmunga wrote:There's only 1 industry standard headphone. Made by Beyer.
DT100s.
mendeldrive wrote:NOBODY designs their own sounds... There is ZERO point in reinventing the wheel.
I bet you have no clue about anything pro audio related, kid.beatmunga wrote:I bet you have a pair of Beats, Ricky Ray.rikhyray wrote:So finally someone posting headphones which make Beats shine, or even iPod ear buds. DT 100 - the worst headphones ever made, ever seen in the studios - good isolation, low price and the most dreadful sound in the history of audio industry.beatmunga wrote:There's only 1 industry standard headphone. Made by Beyer.
DT100s.
rikhyray wrote:I bet you have no clue about anything pro audio related, kid.
mendeldrive wrote:NOBODY designs their own sounds... There is ZERO point in reinventing the wheel.
That is genuinely fucking scary...Sibanger wrote:Type in 'Beats' into google.......
Gotta get me a new interweb search engine......
mendeldrive wrote:NOBODY designs their own sounds... There is ZERO point in reinventing the wheel.
Anger? You repeat like a parrot, or kid without your own thinking, proper research not just marketing info that you found on manufacturer site. The reasons for DT 100 popularity was robust construction, low price, easily replaceable parts and the isolation, making them useful for TV camera men, tracking in the studios, but just for those obsessive with very loud click, no demanding artist would use DT 100 even for tracking.beatmunga wrote:rikhyray wrote:I bet you have no clue about anything pro audio related, kid.
Is the yoga still not working, Rick?
So much anger...
Chill, wise one!rikhyray wrote: Anger? You repeat like a parrot, or kid without your own thinking, proper research not just marketing info that you found on manufacturer site. The reasons for DT 100 popularity was robust construction, low price, easily replaceable parts and the isolation, making them useful for TV camera men, tracking in the studios, but just for those obsessive with very loud click, no demanding artist would use DT 100 even for tracking.
Anyone who ever used, tried DT 100 knows that. It is not not any secret, contrary common knowledge in audio industry since decades.
BTW. if you want to address me directly , how about learning how to spell.
mendeldrive wrote:NOBODY designs their own sounds... There is ZERO point in reinventing the wheel.
Are they the ones with the mic as well? I have an old pair of dt100s that I used to use for a while, but they were like sticking a pair of NS10s in suction cups over my ears and felt like they were sucking all the oxygen out of my body and decompressing my head via my ear drums after a night of making house or techno on them. They are definitely good for tracking vocals etc though..vitalispopoff wrote:completely agree. got a dt150 and although I look like a cameraman from '70s tv station, wouldn't exchange it for any other headphones even if paid for that.