The only thing I'd add is if you're going live and/or if you have any firewire gear go for the non-retina 13" and spec it up as much as you can.
Reasons?
- 13" seems a lot better for stage use, less likely to be knocked over, takes up less space on your stand or rack. It really seems to make a difference.
- the retinas don't have FW. Yes you can use a thunderbolt to FW-800 then FW800-400 cable but do you really want to go dicking around with that live?
Buying a new MBP after the new year need help!
-
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:46 am
Re: Buying a new MBP after the new year need help!
hmm there seems to be a room for recosideration about which environment is more effective, to work in a retina display with its resolution swithced to tiny texts frequently or in a secondary display dedicated to a mixing.Tarekith wrote:With something like QuickRes I can quickly change the display resolution via a key command to (for instance) see all the channels in a large mixdown I'm doing for someone. Sure it can be pretty tiny, but for a birds eye view of things and being able to quick adjust track volumes in large projects, it's a huge time saver not having to scroll all the time.
In the unsupported software the resulution is nearly overly high. I think this resolution doesn't serve enough as an incentive to make people tolorate bluring text/graphic here and there in less dpi and think it's worth to buy. But I agree that mainstream laptop resolution will get higher in the future. And after that the market and softwares would be ready to adopt more pixels for their GUI.While not many apps are shipping in retina resolutions,....