> Why did everything work flawlessly in Live 8 then? My drivers didnt change. Neither did my equipment or my pc. Only Live did.
Yes,
see "it is a version X.01? the net-wisdom involving these is ancient and deep..."
yes, it is problem! a problem they did not encounter with their testing. The Horrors!
Never seen this before!!
But they are more likely to address such an issue if reported in a helpful way, with a full bug report during testing (they automated the process),
or at least with as much USEFUL information as possible, to help isolate and 'triage' the error.
Oh, and has anyone considered that this may be related to indexing on their system? if Live is busy in the background
trying to index your 300 gig collection of samplepacks ... this could explain loss of cycles,
? just thinking...
so this may be related to the indexing of the new browser: if you can, try leaving Live open for a few days,
, does it 'speed up'?
did for me...seriously! (I have 450 gig of samples, only about 25 gig are used all the time)
Man people really can sound aggressive and grating when reporting of errors in new software:
I am sure no one wants such, but the issues of releasing software
in a world where you have n0 control on the environment make testing and verification so very difficult.
Not long ago , many software providers would choose one platform or the other to service, to lessen the size of these issues.
thus: beta programs.
oh, well, i am sure that these are issues for the dev staff. believe it or not.
g'luck,
J2K
PS: i like Live9 so far: and it is much more stable with Max4Live, so my greatest needs are met, so f***in ignore my happy A**!