Bounce vs. Freeze?

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Post Reply
PhunnkMunk
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 3:39 pm

Bounce vs. Freeze?

Post by PhunnkMunk » Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:49 am

is there any difference in the processing power reduction between freezing an individual track and doing a straight bounce-down?

I've read that freezing is essentially a bounce down, where the new wav file replaces the track contents - though does it still eat up any extra CPU power to have the original stuff (be it MIDI or soundfile, and plugins) frozen in the background?


thanks!

BoddAH
Posts: 638
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 7:13 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Re: Bounce vs. Freeze

Post by BoddAH » Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:50 pm

No it´s basically the same thing.

Freeze has the advantage of still being able to unfreeze the tracks and edit settings but the projects can only be opened in Live.

Bouncing your tracks is final but then you have the advantage of being able to import the tracks into another DAW for further mixing or mastering.

Valiumdupeuple
Posts: 1135
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 12:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Bounce vs. Freeze?

Post by Valiumdupeuple » Sun Oct 06, 2013 1:46 pm

And bouncing gives you a mono option. Freeze/flatten always renders stereo or double mono files.

PhunnkMunk
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 3:39 pm

Re: Bounce vs. Freeze?

Post by PhunnkMunk » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:39 am

thanks, guys!

Post Reply