Re: The Great BitWig Migration
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:21 pm
where do I enter the serial?
flattery by imitation, bordering on infringement no doubt? If it looked almost exactly like an Apple product it would be in litigation by now.pelsik wrote:the interface is honestly ableton but a few things moved around
macbeat wrote:Now with this I would agree. Trying Bitwig really does make you appreciate Ableton Live more.
I just demo'd it for about 90 minutes and basically have the same impression. There is a lot I like better than Live, but I really need grouping and freezing. When those things are implemented I might consider buying it during a sale.pelsik wrote:after 2 hours on the demo my honest not too biased opinion:
short version: better than expected but missing key basic features
i know a couple people were saying earlier they wouldn't switch because they don't want to learn a new DAW. ill start by saying the transition is almost seamless after a hour or less of tinkering any Ableton user will feel comfortable enough to make legitimate song. the interface is honestly ableton but a few things moved around
the pluses:
1) multiple audio in 1 clip (downside tho will explain late)*
2) 32/64bit internal bridge is big for me
3) cutting/splitting audio and midi
4) cool plugins like one that lets you put multiple instruments/vst in 1track and let's you blend them or automate to transition between each other
5)opening multiple projects at once
the negative (why ableton has nothing to worry about atleast with version 1)
1) no freezing
2) no legitimate cpu monitoring
3) no markers
4) no true in-clip automation/modulation for volume/pan
5) no grouping (live's grouping isn't good but its better than none)
6) no tap tempo
and those are just the ones i noticed
and it crashes 3rd party plugins often but that'll be fixed soon, probably (easy re-load but still annoying)
and quirky things: from what i can tell, the zoom is unified if you zoom out in 1 clip you zoom out in all clips for everything including notes (even in session view)not a deal breaker but quirky
overall i actually really liked it, the GUI is better than live (at first i thought the opposite but side by side bitwig looks way better). its not going to replace ableton or come close but i actually enjoyed using it, it's easy to use and has the comfort ability and familiarity of ableton.
hopefully ableton starts incorporating some of these features ..competition is always a good thing for the consumer
no crossfaderdeva wrote:Bitwig also misses:
groove tools
time signature changes
tempo data on midi clip import
sending midi data between tracks (cannot record the midi output of an arpeggiator for example)
no option to show vst gui's when switching tracks
no direct macro mapping in the vst gui
no midi step recording
no rewire
...
Yeah, it didn't take a genius to see through that minor deception. The man acts like he's on Bitwig's payroll.stringtapper wrote:FYI.
kennyda = funken
It's bizarre.kb420 wrote:Yeah, it didn't take a genius to see through that minor deception. The man acts like he's on Bitwig's payroll.stringtapper wrote:FYI.
kennyda = funken
that would be dick. Bigdick'skb420 wrote:Yeah, it didn't take a genius to see through that minor deception. The man acts like he's on Bitwig's payroll.stringtapper wrote:FYI.
kennyda = funken