VOLVO VOLVO VOLVO VOLVO VOLVO VOLVO

[Da hand]

Normally you cannot open projects made in another software. Some software can be synced together through rewire, but Garagaband can only be used as a rewire host application - meaning you would have to run Ableton into Garageband and not the other way around. You could export audio stems from Garageband (render out each track as an audio file) and import that into Ableton to work with.

[DangerousDave]

Midi files should be universal between DAWs. I am unaware if garage band has a midi export option (it should) but if it does you should be fine.

[Da hand]

However, the midi files are only notes and instructions that are played by instruments on the tracks that contain the midi files. If you want your projects to sound the same, you would have to use the same instruments in Ableton Live that you used in Garageband. If you are not concerned about the sound too much, you can import the midi files into Ableton and then find instruments that will play them the way you want.

[Airyck]

[pencilrocket]

V8 was asking Garageband question...

[TomViolenz]

That's what one gets for helping out noobs

[re:dream]

But suppose now that technology were no mere means, how would it stand with the will to master it? Yet we said, did we not, that the instrumental definition of technology is correct? To be sure. The correct always fixes upon something pertinent in whatever is under consideration. However, in order to be correct, this fixing by no means needs to uncover the thing in question in its essence. Only at the point where such an uncovering happens does the true come to pass.4 For that reason the merely correct is not yet the true. Only the true brings us into a free relationship with that which concerns us from out of its essence. Accordingly, the correct instrumental definition of technology still does not show us technology’s essence. In order that we may arrive at this, or at least come close to it, we must seek the true by way of the correct. We must ask: What is the instrumental itself? Within what do such things as means and end belong? A means is that whereby something is effected and thus attained. Whatever has an effect as its consequence is called a cause. But not only that by means of which something else is effected is a cause. The end in keeping with which the kind of means to be used is determined is also considered a cause. Wherever ends are pursued and means are employed, wherever instrumentality reigns, there reigns causality.

[TomViolenz]

But suppose now that technology were no mere means, how would it stand
with the will to master it? Yet we said, did we not, that the instrumental definition
of technology is correct? To be sure. The correct always fixes upon something
pertinent in whatever is under consideration. However, in order to be correct,
this fixing by no means needs to uncover the thing in question in its essence. Only
at the point where such an uncovering happens does the true come to pass.4 For
that reason the merely correct is not yet the true. Only the true brings us into a free
relationship with that which concerns us from out of its essence. Accordingly, the
correct instrumental definition of technology still does not show us technology’s
essence. In order that we may arrive at this, or at least come close to it, we must
seek the true by way of the correct. We must ask: What is the instrumental itself?
Within what do such things as means and end belong? A means is that whereby
something is effected and thus attained. Whatever has an effect as its consequence
is called a cause. But not only that by means of which something else is effected is
a cause. The end in keeping with which the kind of means to be used is determined
is also considered a cause. Wherever ends are pursued and means are employed,
wherever instrumentality reigns, there reigns causality.

Spam for the thinking I take it?!

[Airyck]

Sounds good to me though I understood most of it I'm not sure what "Pecksniffian" refers to?

[re:dream]

[TomViolenz]

Ah, Heidegger, a very well known spammer in his time

[Airyck]

Funny, but it makes sense now

[re:dream]

I am enjoying that there is no mention of Volvos in this thread.

[TomViolenz]

I am enjoying that there is no mention of Volvos in this thread.

And you had to ruin that huh?!