Preferred file format for DJing
And let's say you travel a lot and have an iPod mini, and you want to have a little choice...then what?Fuck .MP3s! They are for ponces that want to carry around 10,000 albums on an ipod for when they are on the treadmill at the gym. Fucking ipod armband wearing fools... I hate 'em
Last edited by Nixon on Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I've never had an internal drive fail, whereas I've definitely had external drives fail. Plus any external drive big enough to be worthwhile needs to be powered, which opens up a whole new world of possible disasters - what if someone trips on the cable?hambone1 wrote:Why is using an external drive any riskier than using the internal drive? :?:
And I can't say with any certainty, but I would imagine that having to send data over USB or firewire would be slower than keeping it internal.
The decoding cache is easily cleaned out, or you can set it to not get bigger than a certain size, or to leave a certain amount of space on your drive. It's really quite flexible - I have no problem keeping gigs of mp3s around and only having the wav copies when I'm actually using them.Nixon wrote:if i'm right, using mp3's actually uses more space, because you have the mp3 plus the converted wave file in your "decoding cache" folder.
therefore, if I ever use mp3's (wich I try to avoid), I convert them to waves first.
There are loads of bus-powered USB2 and FW external drives (here's just one: http://www.g-technology.com/Products/G-DRIVE-mini.cfm) And for DJing, USB2 and FW have far more bandwidth than you'll need, especially those with 7200RPM drives.5dots wrote:I've never had an internal drive fail, whereas I've definitely had external drives fail. Plus any external drive big enough to be worthwhile needs to be powered, which opens up a whole new world of possible disasters - what if someone trips on the cable?
And I can't say with any certainty, but I would imagine that having to send data over USB or firewire would be slower than keeping it internal.
Do you DJ with your laptop on battery power? If not, how do you resolve not tripping over your laptop power cable?
There are 160GB internal 2.5" drives now, too.
Last edited by hambone1 on Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.
OK, that's a feasible possibility then, if you're really short in spaceThe decoding cache is easily cleaned out, or you can set it to not get bigger than a certain size, or to leave a certain amount of space on your drive. It's really quite flexible - I have no problem keeping gigs of mp3s around and only having the wav copies when I'm actually using them.
most of the people posting on this are missing a couple of points
1 - converting to WAV or AIFF gives you no gain in sound quality. you dont 'gain anything' by the conversion except loss of disk space, and
2 - the cache size that Live uses for conversion remains a constant value you set, so losing a couple of gigs of space to the cache is not at all the same as losing hundreds of gigs when you convert all your MP3s to WAV and
3 - you realize you are going to have to redo all of your warp markers if you convert? ok cool, and
4 - you also realize that in a live situation, almost nobody will ever, ever be able to tell if you are using MP3, because its almost impossible to hear the difference with a hi-quality one
and if youve converted from MP3, its going to 'sound like' an MP3 anyway (see point #1)
SO imo converting all of your tracks from MP3 to WAV is more or less a lot of work that is a complete waste of time that accomplishes absolutely nothing but a net loss .. of time energy and disk space.
.
1 - converting to WAV or AIFF gives you no gain in sound quality. you dont 'gain anything' by the conversion except loss of disk space, and
2 - the cache size that Live uses for conversion remains a constant value you set, so losing a couple of gigs of space to the cache is not at all the same as losing hundreds of gigs when you convert all your MP3s to WAV and
3 - you realize you are going to have to redo all of your warp markers if you convert? ok cool, and
4 - you also realize that in a live situation, almost nobody will ever, ever be able to tell if you are using MP3, because its almost impossible to hear the difference with a hi-quality one
and if youve converted from MP3, its going to 'sound like' an MP3 anyway (see point #1)
SO imo converting all of your tracks from MP3 to WAV is more or less a lot of work that is a complete waste of time that accomplishes absolutely nothing but a net loss .. of time energy and disk space.
.
--
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger
josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger
josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com
nixon asked:
otherwise, i am with the angry ones, damn F*(^% mp3s!!!
if you make or perform music, stay away from that crap!
for ipods, maybee ok. BUT THAT'S IT!
my 2cents, jeeez HD space costs fuck all nothing in our days!!! NOTHING it's so rediculous cheap, and there is no issue with external HDs! they are used in studios a plenty!! (just don't buy the worst crap, a good quality HD is also dead cheap!)
i actually think, REALLY BELIEVE that audio apps programmer, ALL of them should take all those, sorry for my hard words! idiotic kids by the hand and bann mp3s from there supported file list. here is a thread about tinnitus, mp3s are one link in the chain that leads to ear problems like that if they are cranked up, distorted, harsh, bassless flying over a serious soundsystem...DAMN!!!! but what i am saying, you will realise that in years to come after you loose completely your hearing sensivity. full stop!
use AAC files, small and good for ipod-ing (better then mp3s, a AAC 128kbs equals about a 192kbs mp3 in sound (roughly), that is a compression for ipod-ing that makes sense!)And let's say you travel a lot and have a iPod mini, and you want to have a little choice...then what?
otherwise, i am with the angry ones, damn F*(^% mp3s!!!
if you make or perform music, stay away from that crap!
for ipods, maybee ok. BUT THAT'S IT!
my 2cents, jeeez HD space costs fuck all nothing in our days!!! NOTHING it's so rediculous cheap, and there is no issue with external HDs! they are used in studios a plenty!! (just don't buy the worst crap, a good quality HD is also dead cheap!)
i actually think, REALLY BELIEVE that audio apps programmer, ALL of them should take all those, sorry for my hard words! idiotic kids by the hand and bann mp3s from there supported file list. here is a thread about tinnitus, mp3s are one link in the chain that leads to ear problems like that if they are cranked up, distorted, harsh, bassless flying over a serious soundsystem...DAMN!!!! but what i am saying, you will realise that in years to come after you loose completely your hearing sensivity. full stop!
Last edited by SubFunk on Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
hambone1 wrote:There are loads of bus-powered USB2 and FW external drives. And for DJing, USB2 and FW have far more bandwidth than you'll need, especially those with 7200RPM drives.
Do you DJ with your laptop on battery power? If not, how do you resolve not tripping over your laptop power cable?
Yes, there are lots of bus-powered drives, but they're all pretty small. I want more capacity than that.
As to your second point, yes, I keep my laptop plugged in, but unlike a drive, it does have a battery. Worst case scenario there, I have to find the plug and put it back, though I've probably got at least 2 hours of battery life, so even doing that isn't urgent. If my external gets unplugged, it goes down.
Another thing that just occurred to me is the extra table space an external takes up. I've played several gigs where I had to cram in next to turntables/mixers that people couldn't be bothered to move - I was lucky to fit in my midi controller, much less an external.
robtronik wrote:I use FLAC. Lossless compression, no loss in audio quality. Allows me to store more tracks on my computer.
rob.
yes, the other thing i was going to add is that if I do have WAV or AIFF, i convert over to FLAC, enter the tag info and warp.
i just dont bother to convert MP3 over to anything for the reasons i gave above
.
--
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger
josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger
josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com
Re: Preferred file format for DJing
WAV 16/24 bit 44.1khznagyember wrote:Hi!
I plan to use Ableton mainly for DJing, and I heard different things about preferred file formats. A friend of mine told me that Ableton kinda renders (?) a temporary wave file from any compressed type when used, so it's not worth storing my music as mp3s. Since I use a laptop, where file size is crucial (I know I know i know quality is crucial as well) I should know what file type(s) to prefer as a DJ.
( tried to search this Forum, but couldn't find any relevant... If this issue has already been discussed, please drop me a link.)
Thanks in advance
Scube
Waiting for Qbits..
Obviously , the quality won't improve if you convert mp3 to wav, but if you want to keep your files in self contaiend sets, like me , and work on different hdd's/pc's I want to convert them to waves, because if I drag my set to another pc, the mp3's will have to be decoded AGAIN, wich takes up my precious time..i just dont bother to convert MP3 over to anything for the reasons i gave above
24?? is this on normal audio cd's as well???WAV 16/24 bit 44.1khz