Quality of Live's Plugins

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.

Are Live's Plugins Good Enough?

Yes, I do all my work with Live's native plugins.
18
21%
I combine Live plugs with other plugins when I need something more.
60
69%
Live's plugins are not good enough, and I use other plugins even though CPU usage is higher.
9
10%
 
Total votes: 87

Tarekith
Posts: 19074
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:46 pm
Contact:

Post by Tarekith » Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:55 pm

I have no issues using Live's plug ins for my live sets or my DJ sets, that's what they were designed for IMO. For production work though, I always reach for my Sonalksis dynamics and EQ plugs. Things like Beat Repeat and some of the other more unique plug ins are used as well.

I actually wish Ableton would start to focus on more creative effects now (like Beat Repeat), leave the EQ's and other common tools to the groups that specialize in that.

roach808
Posts: 683
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:25 am
Location: Tampa Bay, Fl

Post by roach808 » Fri Dec 22, 2006 2:03 pm

Machinesworking wrote: I own no Waves products, Nomad Factory is doing it for me, PSP would if they ever got UB out.....
If you haven't for some reason messed with Buffer Override, it's a great compliment to Beat Repeat.

Seriously, Nomad Factory plugins rock. Also, some of my favorite plugins are free (destroy FX).
roach- the other white meat
Image
http://www.themenacetosobriety.com/blog/
MBP, Live Suite, and lots of nice analogue gear.

sweetjesus
Posts: 8803
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: www.fridge.net.au
Contact:

Post by sweetjesus » Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:38 pm

slow riot wrote:
Contra wrote:
please dont tell me it was the SSL Bundle....id be disappointed if so.
nah it was just the doppler effect plugin. but they don't offer support to ableton users with any of their plugs I don't think.
ill probably get into hot water by saying this,

i used waves for many years (helped being a distributor of their products a long while back) however with their current gen of stuff, i was part of the waves beta, i didnt really get to beta because nobody could tell me how to go through and properly install the damned thing.

i think of myself as technically capable, but they have such a convoluted way of doing things, people like myself would rather make music.

slow riot
Posts: 201
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:05 pm
Location: uk

Post by slow riot » Fri Dec 22, 2006 5:27 pm

sweetjesus wrote: ill probably get into hot water by saying this,

i used waves for many years (helped being a distributor of their products a long while back) however with their current gen of stuff, i was part of the waves beta, i didnt really get to beta because nobody could tell me how to go through and properly install the damned thing.

i think of myself as technically capable, but they have such a convoluted way of doing things, people like myself would rather make music.
yeah that's one of the main things that pissed me off as well. The installation process is as you say, convoluted, vague, and also very disrespectful to the fact that most people working with audio on their computer value having a stable and working system, and like to be in control of what software is doing what and why.

most au's and vst's are perfect at this. you d/l the plugin, put it in the right folder, load up your host and you're away. No mess, no silly bloatware and maximum enjoyment and creative output.

Waves is the complete opposite. To get the equivalent of one plugin on my computer, which was all I wanted, I had to download the whole gold package, install the whole thing, as well as some dubious authorization software. And then go through every one of the files, work out which ones I did and didnt need. Obviously if they just installed a bunch of au's and vst's it wouldn't be a problem. i could just remove the one's I didn't want, and it would be ok. but they use their own auxilliary plugin interface, which is terribly organised, and obviously poorly coded. Now after I hhave gone through this annoying process, every single plugin (of which there are nearly a hundred I'd guess) still shows up in ableton. And there's nothing I can do about it, because they don't offer support to ableton users.

it's basically the equivalent of a guitarist paying someone to install, say, some new pick ups, and getting their beloved instrument back covered in shit. A musicians job is to make music, not clean up other peoples shit (no offence to the international janitorial community is intended there, i fully appreciate the valuable work that you do in human/faecal relations and offer my sincerest apologies if I have inadvetantly caused any).

fuck waves. :evil: :evil:
ibook g4, osx 10.4.7, maudio f/w audiophile, novation sl25

myspace

WaveRider
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: Montreal

Post by WaveRider » Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:45 pm

My opinion on live`s audio effects is that some are very poor regarding sound quality. Some are inventive and worth using (beat repeat), very few sound good enough to me. Some sound embarassingly bad (reverb, chorus, delay,flange, compressors) , some are ok (auto filter, eqs) but far from spectacular sounding.

To this day I never heard a good chorus/flanger on a computer. Compare those to a cheap boss pedal for exemple, no need to even talk about hi-end TC and lexicons hardware.

..and there is an explanation for this. All because of 0s and 1s...

I like Live`s midi effects and wish they made more.

Enots
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:02 am

Post by Enots » Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:55 pm

The effects aren't bad. The only ones i usually grab for are reverb, auto filter and occassionally erosion. The verbs are alright, no real complaint and very low CPU hit.

In reality, all of my work is mixed in outside studios, Logic, PT, or Sonar usually so any effects that are there to help the mix vs creative usage of it (i.e. drowning a sound in a verb purposherely) gets put on at mixing stage by another engineer. IF you planned on doing your own mixing, I'd definitely suggest getting some other plugs for that
Christ Jesus is King
www.tonystonebeats.com

Machinesworking
Posts: 11421
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Seattle

Post by Machinesworking » Fri Dec 22, 2006 8:05 pm

WaveRider wrote:To this day I never heard a good chorus/flanger on a computer. Compare those to a cheap boss pedal for exemple, no need to even talk about hi-end TC and lexicons hardware.
http://www.audiodamage.com/

The Dischord plug in, the demos sound promising, I might bite.

Though I'm partial to the chorus in Logic.... doesn't help you much I know. :?

difference
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:36 pm

Post by difference » Sat Dec 23, 2006 8:32 am

slow riot wrote:
Contra wrote:
please dont tell me it was the SSL Bundle....id be disappointed if so.
nah it was just the doppler effect plugin. but they don't offer support to ableton users with any of their plugs I don't think.
I think it is as much the other way round to be honest. Ableton doesn't support Waves.

krank
Posts: 731
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:34 am

Post by krank » Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:42 pm

Enots wrote:The verbs are alright, no real complaint and very low CPU hit.
Are we using the same host?

tomperson
Posts: 1018
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:55 am
Location: MVD, Uruguay, South America
Contact:

Post by tomperson » Tue Dec 26, 2006 1:38 pm

ethios4 wrote:After years of using Live's plugins, I like the FX-type plugins (chorus, flange, phaser, beat repeat, redux, etc). I do not find the native EQs, compressors, filters, and reverbs to be of sufficient quality for most serious production work.

The EQ and compressor seem to suck the life out sounds, and when there are many tracks going on the cumulative effect is definitely not my cup of tea. I like them if I am mangling sounds into completely new sounds, but if I want to simply EQ a really great synth part I prefer nicer plugins.

I'm sure it is a combination of Ableton wanting CPU-friendly plugins for live performance, and not wanting to spend a lot of development time on something that probably only serious users would want, and most serious users probably already have their EQ and compressor plugins of choice.

I've tried beginning production with Live's plugins, and then switching them out for high-quality, but that is a huge pain in the ass and never works out right. From now on I'm beginning with nice plugins :)
I feel ya. Same thing here, same way of dealing with the problem too. What can I say, i have tested live eq against some quite well known high class EQs (sonalksis) and the difference is really obvious. Same thing with the comp, never seemed to get a decent sound out of it. Not one within my taste range at least...
Turn up the radio. Turn up the tape machine. Look into the sunset up ahead. Roll the windows down for a better taste of the cool desert wind. Ah yes. This is what it's all about. Total control now.

Post Reply