Take the Sweetjesus Duende vs Waves SSL blind test
-
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
b0unce wrote:did you listen to those wavs yourself ?
B has uglyass pops-crackles....I think B sounds fatter on these headphones[mdr-v900]<<<--iBook/internalsoundcard, but whats up with those artifacts ? they're in the way, so to speak..
just checked
the pops n stuff are indeed nasty
hmmm
that was an offline render. i wonder if its a bug
-
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
Upload that, and I willsweetjesus wrote:put it up that .5 db and still have a listenMachinate wrote:And there, my friends, is the reason why we all feel that b.wav sounds "phatter"...dom wrote:also i pushed a.wav by 0.5db because they're not normalized and b.wav is slightly louder...
mbp 2.66, osx 10.6.8, 8GB ram.
-
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
get your hand off your lemur and just move a knob up a notch.Machinate wrote:Upload that, and I willsweetjesus wrote:put it up that .5 db and still have a listenMachinate wrote: And there, my friends, is the reason why we all feel that b.wav sounds "phatter"...
ill redo all the tests as everyone likes to make them technically accurate as possible since im gonna buy the duende.
the eq's the winnah for me.
-
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
sameMachinate wrote:so is the duende mix b? I like that one the most, but I can't really put my finger on why...
its the glue in the mix i keep hearing everyone refer to with SSL's.
it defies logic .. its fucked but i trust my ears and everyone else's.
edit: yeah in the first test: A = waves, B = duende
-
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:29 pm
I would just like to point out that the Waves SSL4000 are emulating this mixer...
And the duende software is based on the same software that is in the C series of SSL mixers....
So it is a matter of taste. They are not intended to sound the same. This is just info from the SSL site I am not making this stuff up.
And the duende software is based on the same software that is in the C series of SSL mixers....
So it is a matter of taste. They are not intended to sound the same. This is just info from the SSL site I am not making this stuff up.
-
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
hi mikMike Goodwin wrote:I would just like to point out that the Waves SSL4000 are emulating this mixer...
And the duende software is based on the same software that is in the C series of SSL mixers....
So it is a matter of taste. They are not intended to sound the same. This is just info from the SSL site I am not making this stuff up.
yes u are right
however the 9000/C series code emulates the 4000 series.
so in a sense its SSL emulating the 4000 vs Waves emulating the 4000.
-
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:29 pm
-
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:12 pm
- Location: www.fridge.net.au
- Contact:
yesMike Goodwin wrote:wow now that is just getting sad in a way, cant we just do anything new? The whole emulation thing is getting out of hand.sweetjesus wrote: hi mik
yes u are right
however the 9000/C series code emulates the 4000 series.
so in a sense its SSL emulating the 4000 vs Waves emulating the 4000.
except that SSL built their own consoles and wrote their own code based on their own knowledge of their own product. I don't think that's sad.
it sounds fucking awesome actually.
i just used it on a mixdown of a complete track. im sold. just hoping some others may also go this route and appreciate the resulting quality
Like I was saying with the cpu load/etc......it's the logical choice
Then, you can also get that drum plugin that is supposed to be EVEN BETTER than the stuff you get....
Now, here's the next test though......the mother of all tests......why ain't ya got a liquid mix to so how it compares......hmmmmmmm? Mr "I got all the goodies?".........
Then, you can also get that drum plugin that is supposed to be EVEN BETTER than the stuff you get....
Now, here's the next test though......the mother of all tests......why ain't ya got a liquid mix to so how it compares......hmmmmmmm? Mr "I got all the goodies?".........
-
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:29 pm
!
You have a good point. It is just SSL moving forward. I am not saying that it fails to sound fantastic. I belive that it would. I have only worked with the waves versioin and I like them a lot. So Duende would be great if you are into external DSP tech I for one had very bad expearance with dsp cards and live but that is just me. Enjoy it!sweetjesus wrote:
yes
except that SSL built their own consoles and wrote their own code based on their own knowledge of their own product. I don't think that's sad.
it sounds fucking awesome actually.
i just used it on a mixdown of a complete track. im sold. just hoping some others may also go this route and appreciate the resulting quality