Vote for Hillary!!!
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 2:38 pm
Vote for Hillary!!!
If elected, I will provide full funding for all new features in Ableton. Double the wages of all working musician's. Breakup of all media monopolies and give music back to the people.
I am the Hostess with the Mostess, the boy toy extraordinaire!
I am the Hostess with the Mostess, the boy toy extraordinaire!
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:10 am
- Contact:
Re: Vote for Hillary!!!
Maybe for McCain or the Thompson Twats, bitch that snatch dried up 30 years ago.Hillary Clinton wrote:I am the Hostess with the Mostess, the boy toy extraordinaire!
Billary is planning on spending US dollars on a German company, nice plan. Better ask your husband about that one.
I say no more dependence on foreign DAWs!!
If elected I will set up a $100 million fund that will go towards DAW development every year. The monies from this fund will go to leading developers to make software BETTER than Live. I will take this DAW and make it freely available.
Hillary wants to send your money to Germany, I will keep it in the US while creating more jobs.
Suck it Hillary.
-
- Posts: 6490
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 4:23 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA.
Re: Vote for Hillary!!!
Speaking of Germany, outsourcing in the in the US and Jobs - my man Thomas Sowell has something to say about that - very well put tooBarack Obama wrote:Maybe for McCain or the Thompson Twats, bitch that snatch dried up 30 years ago.Hillary Clinton wrote:I am the Hostess with the Mostess, the boy toy extraordinaire!
Billary is planning on spending US dollars on a German company, nice plan. Better ask your husband about that one.
I say no more dependence on foreign DAWs!!
If elected I will set up a $100 million fund that will go towards DAW development every year. The monies from this fund will go to leading developers to make software BETTER than Live. I will take this DAW and make it freely available.
Hillary wants to send your money to Germany, I will keep it in the US while creating more jobs.
Jobs have become a big issue in this election year — which means that it is optimistic to expect a rational discussion.
Nothing is discussed more irrationally than "outsourcing." It is obviously completely misleading to discuss how many jobs American companies are sending to other countries without even mentioning how many jobs foreign countries are outsourcing to Americans.
Official statistics published last March in the Survey of Current Business showed an increase of 2.8 million jobs outsourced by American-owned multinational corporations during a quarter of a century ending in 2001. Over that same span of time, there was an increase of 4.7 million jobs outsourced to Americans by foreign-owned multinational corporations.
These numbers go back and forth over time. But they don't even exist in the rhetoric of those denouncing outsourcing.
Any laws passed to stop the outsourcing of American jobs to other countries are almost certain to bring laws in other countries to stop the outsourcing of jobs to Americans.
We had something like that during the Great Depression of the 1930s, when international trade restrictions were imposed in order to save jobs during a period of record unemployment. Countries around the world did the same thing, with the net result of a sharp reduction of international trade and a needless prolonging of the depression.
Many policies designed to "save jobs" have effects that are the opposite of their intentions. Germany has some of the strongest job protection laws in the world — and double-digit unemployment rates are common in Germany.
Job protection laws add to the cost of labor. These laws may save the jobs of those who already have jobs but the passage of time brings new young job applicants into the labor market and the high cost of labor means that employers have incentives to get their work done by substituting machines for workers or by shifting to producing products that require less labor.
Countries in the European Union as a whole have stronger job protection laws than the United States — and higher unemployment rates because their rate of job creation is much slower.
On the other end of the spectrum, there has probably never been any place with a more unrestricted labor market than Hong Kong when it was a British colony. Unemployment rates of one or two percent were common in Hong Kong then. After China took over Hong Kong, it created various new benefits for workers — and unemployment rates hit 7 percent, not high by European standards, but a multiple of what it had been for years.
What all this says, in various ways, is that there is no free lunch — not even during election years.
Last edited by djadonis206 on Wed May 14, 2008 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
and pwnage did ensue... John Edwards is endorsing Obama tonight
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washing ... ama-1.html
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washing ... ama-1.html
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
Re: Vote for Hillary!!!
you know, my husband said that americans are so fucking retarded.Barack Obama wrote:Billary is planning on spending US dollars on a German company, nice plan. Better ask your husband about that one.Hillary Clinton wrote:I am the Hostess with the Mostess, the boy toy extraordinaire!
Hillary wants to send your money to Germany, I will keep it in the US while creating more jobs.
i could not believe, until now.
Re: Vote for Hillary!!!
ahhh you're a chick, explains why you're always wrong.Dominik wrote:you know, my husband said that...
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
Re: Vote for Hillary!!!
you're right. i was lying!Tone Deft wrote:ahhh you're a chick, explains why you're always wrong.Dominik wrote:you know, my husband said that...
i don't have a husband at all.
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 6:15 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Vote for Hillary!!!
lmfao!!Dominik wrote:you're right. i was lying!Tone Deft wrote:ahhh you're a chick, explains why you're always wrong.Dominik wrote:you know, my husband said that...
i don't have a husband at all.
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz