ot... Mars Phoenix Lander
knotkranky wrote:This is reason enough. Check this footage. OMG
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8ff_j4mDyk
I was going to say it looked like a giant cock, then I found out why
-
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 3:05 am
its a problem, but not insurmountable. this is a good page on the challenges:forge wrote:cosmic radiation is a major hurdle to overcome - astronauts sent to mars would almost certainly die from it, or at least get very sickadventurepants_ wrote:why not?Dominik wrote: why?
mostly because it would be fucking cool to overcome the challenges, and do some good science. why did the ancients send ships over the horizon?
likewise, building a moon base is fraught with danger because of the amount of space rocks thumping into it - apparently it's not so much the rocks themselves but the pieces they smash into which are like bullets
hangon - was that this thread I read this in or was it Wired?
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/m ... 40120.html
-
- Posts: 4336
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:08 pm
- Location: la
I think the bigger problem is sustainability. A week up and back to the moon. sure. Over two years for mars? what the fuck are
you gonna do, or eat and how are ya not gonna kill the person right next to you. We may have to destroy a few humans just to get them there. And then back?
It's all fantasy to me. But... there was only 66 years between Kittyhawk and the moon landing
you gonna do, or eat and how are ya not gonna kill the person right next to you. We may have to destroy a few humans just to get them there. And then back?
It's all fantasy to me. But... there was only 66 years between Kittyhawk and the moon landing
yeah - and there is no question progress happens much quicker now than it did thenknotkranky wrote:.. there was only 66 years between Kittyhawk and the moon landing
personally I think it's incredibly unlikely that there is NOT life on other planets, but if they can travel here then they will have probably needed to develop some way of stepping through space - which I'd believe could be possible - going A to B just isn't going to be possible for anyone anywhere as the nearest possible planets are at least a whole human life time away at the speed of light
maybe well get to mars when we figure out what neutrinos are up to - or whatever those things are that apparently jump through space and maybe time - my complete coffee table ignorance of physics is showing now - maybe Higgs Boson is what I'm thinking of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
the tough part is bringing people/things BACK from Mars. right now we can just send small robots with a short life span on a one way trip.
Last edited by Tone Deft on Mon May 26, 2008 4:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
-
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 3:05 am
i would bet the farm that there is other life in the universe. the main problem is that given the size and age of the universe, the likelyhood that any two societies would actually reach the technology required for sustained spaceflight, and be close enough to meet each other, in the same timeframe is infinitesimal.forge wrote:yeah - and there is no question progress happens much quicker now than it did thenknotkranky wrote:.. there was only 66 years between Kittyhawk and the moon landing
personally I think it's incredibly unlikely that there is NOT life on other planets, but if they can travel here then they will have probably needed to develop some way of stepping through space - which I'd believe could be possible - going A to B just isn't going to be possible for anyone anywhere as the nearest possible planets are at least a whole human life time away at the speed of light
maybe well get to mars when we figure out what neutrinos are up to - or whatever those things are that apparently jump through space and maybe time - my complete coffee table ignorance of physics is showing now
Didn't i read some place that this has only been recorded once and that even then is was only possible because the circumstances of the experiment meant that the speed of light had been slowed down as it was having to travel through a medium other than a vacuum???forge wrote: maybe well get to mars when we figure out what neutrinos are up to - or whatever those things are that apparently jump through space and maybe time - my complete coffee table ignorance of physics is showing now
15" 2.4 MBP/Live/Sampler/Operator/ Home made Dumble clone/Two Strats/One Jazz Bass.
Come and visit any time= Soundcloud
Come and visit any time= Soundcloud
-
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 3:05 am
see I don;t agree with this - for the simple reason that if you think about it the technological level we are at now really has happened over the space of about 350 years since the industrial revolutionadventurepants_ wrote:i would bet the farm that there is other life in the universe. the main problem is that given the size and age of the universe, the likelyhood that any two societies would actually reach the technology required for sustained spaceflight, and be close enough to meet each other, in the same timeframe is infinitesimal.forge wrote:yeah - and there is no question progress happens much quicker now than it did thenknotkranky wrote:.. there was only 66 years between Kittyhawk and the moon landing
personally I think it's incredibly unlikely that there is NOT life on other planets, but if they can travel here then they will have probably needed to develop some way of stepping through space - which I'd believe could be possible - going A to B just isn't going to be possible for anyone anywhere as the nearest possible planets are at least a whole human life time away at the speed of light
maybe well get to mars when we figure out what neutrinos are up to - or whatever those things are that apparently jump through space and maybe time - my complete coffee table ignorance of physics is showing now
before then technology made really pretty small steps and technology wasn't a great deal different to what the Romans, Greeks and Persians etc had
so it is possible to go from inventing steam power to space flight and mapping the human DNA in under 400 years
that is an unbelievably small amount of time in cosmic terms to make such a massive leap
what if one other planet didn't have giant dangerous reptiles and the bi-pedal life forms with clever brains evolved 400 million years earlier?
and if the universe really is infinite then there are probably billions of worlds like this
I think tone deft's picture probably sums it up - we're probably being observed, but any higher intelligence must surely see there are too many reasons to not interfere - first there;s the chance we'll nuke them, but second they probably want to see what we do - it must be fascinating
...and that's really what it's all about. We've completely squandered the time since the moon landing with that goofy Space Shuttle. Okay, the Space Shuttle is kinda cool, but. But.knotkranky wrote: But... there was only 66 years between Kittyhawk and the moon landing
But the Shuttle program completely lacks the basic ingredients of any cool space endeavor: mystery, imagination, adventure. Sure one of them blows up every so often, but beyond that who gives a shit? Ho hum. Another shuttle mission.
It's pretty depressing when you think of how far we've got to go in order to even scratch the surface of the kind of basic tech you see in sciFi flicks. Fuck Mars. How about devoting all our energies and resources to developing faster than light travel? We could visit Mars in the morning and be back in time for lunch. Of course, everyone knows you can't go faster than light in terms of velocity, but Einstein left a nice wide opening in his theory that basically says your golden if you can figure out how to do what the universe already does naturally to a certain degree: fold the fabric of space time.
Warp Drive (and the ever-loving-cool Warp Bubble) here we come!
-
- Posts: 4336
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:08 pm
- Location: la
forge wrote:see I don;t agree with this - for the simple reason that if you think about it the technological level we are at now really has happened over the space of about 350 years since the industrial revolutionadventurepants_ wrote:i would bet the farm that there is other life in the universe. the main problem is that given the size and age of the universe, the likelyhood that any two societies would actually reach the technology required for sustained spaceflight, and be close enough to meet each other, in the same timeframe is infinitesimal.forge wrote: yeah - and there is no question progress happens much quicker now than it did then
personally I think it's incredibly unlikely that there is NOT life on other planets, but if they can travel here then they will have probably needed to develop some way of stepping through space - which I'd believe could be possible - going A to B just isn't going to be possible for anyone anywhere as the nearest possible planets are at least a whole human life time away at the speed of light
maybe well get to mars when we figure out what neutrinos are up to - or whatever those things are that apparently jump through space and maybe time - my complete coffee table ignorance of physics is showing now
before then technology made really pretty small steps and technology wasn't a great deal different to what the Romans, Greeks and Persians etc had
so it is possible to go from inventing steam power to space flight and mapping the human DNA in under 400 years
that is an unbelievably small amount of time in cosmic terms to make such a massive leap
what if one other planet didn't have giant dangerous reptiles and the bi-pedal life forms with clever brains evolved 400 million years earlier?
and if the universe really is infinite then there are probably billions of worlds like this
I think tone deft's picture probably sums it up - we're probably being observed, but any higher intelligence must surely see there are too many reasons to not interfere - first there;s the chance we'll nuke them, but second they probably want to see what we do - it must be fascinating
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WudBfRa0ETw < how to serve man
-
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 3:05 am
i dont think you appreciate the scale of the universe. our nearest star is about 5 light years away. thats 5 years travel time at the speed of light. an average star is literally thousands of light years away. so even if they were sending us the encylopedia galactica encoded into the wavelength of light, it would take thousands, tens of thousands or millions of years to reach us.forge wrote:see I don;t agree with this - for the simple reason that if you think about it the technological level we are at now really has happened over the space of about 350 years since the industrial revolutionadventurepants_ wrote:i would bet the farm that there is other life in the universe. the main problem is that given the size and age of the universe, the likelyhood that any two societies would actually reach the technology required for sustained spaceflight, and be close enough to meet each other, in the same timeframe is infinitesimal.forge wrote: yeah - and there is no question progress happens much quicker now than it did then
personally I think it's incredibly unlikely that there is NOT life on other planets, but if they can travel here then they will have probably needed to develop some way of stepping through space - which I'd believe could be possible - going A to B just isn't going to be possible for anyone anywhere as the nearest possible planets are at least a whole human life time away at the speed of light
maybe well get to mars when we figure out what neutrinos are up to - or whatever those things are that apparently jump through space and maybe time - my complete coffee table ignorance of physics is showing now
before then technology made really pretty small steps and technology wasn't a great deal different to what the Romans, Greeks and Persians etc had
so it is possible to go from inventing steam power to space flight and mapping the human DNA in under 400 years
that is an unbelievably small amount of time in cosmic terms to make such a massive leap
what if one other planet didn't have giant dangerous reptiles and the bi-pedal life forms with clever brains evolved 400 million years earlier?
and if the universe really is infinite then there are probably billions of worlds like this
I think tone deft's picture probably sums it up - we're probably being observed, but any higher intelligence must surely see there are too many reasons to not interfere - first there;s the chance we'll nuke them, but second they probably want to see what we do - it must be fascinating
plenty of time for a civilisation to grow, develop and die out from its own hand or an extinction event.