Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 3:48 am
curious?dj_huck wrote:the smoking argument is ridiculous.
curious?dj_huck wrote:the smoking argument is ridiculous.
Yeah, but you don't work in a corporate office and correct me if I'm wrong, have any children living in your homehambone1 wrote:Porn (like violence) is now so prevalent in on the web that it no longer shocks or offends me. I'm numb to it. It doesn't really matter to me any more.
IMO, it's nothing more than a sad substitute for real human interaction, and if there was no demand for it, it would disappear.
you've just posted off-topic, and pretty fuckin rudely at that, well done! how's your sense of irony today?dj_huck wrote:typical ableton forum discussion. way to stay on topic. way to be civil to each other. the smoking argument is ridiculous. i think that porn is not the only problem on this forum. 4000+ post pricks are a problem too
Right on. Smoking is my #1 most hated thing on earth and they've finally passed laws in my state that totally bans smoking in any establishment that is 18 and up any day(s) during the week. Only some 21+ places are smoker friendly, and I avoid all of them like the plague because I don't like my eyes burning and me smelling like a nicotine bath when I get home. I think full public smoking bans are in the works, and they can't come a moment too soon.forge wrote:20% people smoke where I live, why should the 80% have to breathe their smoke?
Good point.suburbanbather wrote:Yeah, but you don't work in a corporate office and correct me if I'm wrong, have any children living in your home.hambone1 wrote:Porn (like violence) is now so prevalent in on the web that it no longer shocks or offends me. I'm numb to it. It doesn't really matter to me any more.
IMO, it's nothing more than a sad substitute for real human interaction, and if there was no demand for it, it would disappear.
I don't like smokers anymore than anybody else, and I voted to outlaw smoking in restaurants and bars. Unfortunately I didn't think about the externalities of my decision.Dr. TaaDow wrote:Right on. Smoking is my #1 most hated thing on earth and they've finally passed laws in my state that totally bans smoking in any establishment that is 18 and up any day(s) during the week. Only some 21+ places are smoker friendly, and I avoid all of them like the plague because I don't like my eyes burning and me smelling like a nicotine bath when I get home. I think full public smoking bans are in the works, and they can't come a moment too soon.forge wrote:20% people smoke where I live, why should the 80% have to breathe their smoke?
I know smoking has nothing to do with the thread topic, but I had to reply and I can relate to that.
Think again; tyrants have an endless agenda. The cigarette Nazis said they didn't care about what people did to their own lungs; they only cared about the health effects on others — secondhand smoke. I said that's a smoke screen to conceal their true agenda. In California, there's a movement to outlaw smoking on beaches, many outdoor stadiums have banned smoking, and there have been attempts to ban smoking on streets and parks. I'd like to see the health study pointing to the deaths and injuries stemming from secondhand smoke outdoors.
The bottom line here isn't ladies' night or smoking. It's how we Americans are allowing tyrants to attack our liberties. If we allow them to continue, once we wake up we won't have enough freedom to stop them from turning us into a nation of serfs.
Anti-smoking legislation is hardly the hallmark of a draconian society, only one that has finally recognized that a socially acceptable behavior is lethal....we'll see the same things with skin cancer & cell phone usage in the next 20 years I'm sure.djadonis206 wrote: I don't like smokers anymore than anybody else, and I voted to outlaw smoking in restaurants and bars. Unfortunately I didn't think about the externalities of my decision.
........
here is a couple paragraphs from the Walter Williams article
Think again; tyrants have an endless agenda. The cigarette Nazis said they didn't care about what people did to their own lungs; they only cared about the health effects on others — secondhand smoke. I said that's a smoke screen to conceal their true agenda. In California, there's a movement to outlaw smoking on beaches, many outdoor stadiums have banned smoking, and there have been attempts to ban smoking on streets and parks. I'd like to see the health study pointing to the deaths and injuries stemming from secondhand smoke outdoors.
The bottom line here isn't ladies' night or smoking. It's how we Americans are allowing tyrants to attack our liberties. If we allow them to continue, once we wake up we won't have enough freedom to stop them from turning us into a nation of serfs.
fyi, I do not agree with his use of the word Nazi.
If Ableton changes their policy, cool - that makes it easier for everyone and no one will probably complain (I wont)
yeah in an ideal world - I would bet a large sum of money that the majority of the people who look at porn are in relationships or marriedhambone1 wrote:Good point.suburbanbather wrote:Yeah, but you don't work in a corporate office and correct me if I'm wrong, have any children living in your home.hambone1 wrote:Porn (like violence) is now so prevalent in on the web that it no longer shocks or offends me. I'm numb to it. It doesn't really matter to me any more.
IMO, it's nothing more than a sad substitute for real human interaction, and if there was no demand for it, it would disappear.
As I said, if people got real lives and the demand for porn disappeared, the porn would disappear, too.
In an ideal world, perhaps...
The question must be: Then why do you do those things? Surely you are not giving anyone incentive to change if you keep following them outside to smoke, or keep waiting outside for them to finish smoking?djadonis206 wrote: I don't like smokers anymore than anybody else, and I voted to outlaw smoking in restaurants and bars. Unfortunately I didn't think about the externalities of my decision.
So, now when I go out with friends who smoke, in order to continue a conversation, I have to get up and go outside with them to smoke. This to me a major inconvenience. Waiting for people to finish a cigarette before we walk into any establishment is major buzz kill for me.
smoking is their rightMachinate wrote:The question must be: Then why do you do those things? Surely you are not giving anyone incentive to change if you keep following them outside to smoke, or keep waiting outside for them to finish smoking?djadonis206 wrote: I don't like smokers anymore than anybody else, and I voted to outlaw smoking in restaurants and bars. Unfortunately I didn't think about the externalities of my decision.
So, now when I go out with friends who smoke, in order to continue a conversation, I have to get up and go outside with them to smoke. This to me a major inconvenience. Waiting for people to finish a cigarette before we walk into any establishment is major buzz kill for me.
I vote that your friends could do better, and actually just respect your company.
a.
At this point I'd like to ask you to re-read what I wrotedjadonis206 wrote: smoking is their right
I have the choice to either, sit by myself for 5 to 10 minutes or stand outside with them while they smoke
they have the choice to either not smoke or smoke
both parties have a decision to make, if we're lucky we can agree on a compromise or compromise our position
but I'm in no position to tell someone to smoke or not to smoke regardless of how I morally feel about it
I believe equal rights means equal rights - not which ever rights are to my liking