Remix Contest by Team Remixus.com

BoryZee · Post by **BoryZee** » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:36 pm

FMB wrote:
blinkeye wrote:my favorite part from the kvr forum he spammed as RemixContest:

RemixContest wrote:the MP3 apacellas are in 128kbps because that's CD Quality..
when questioned about this, he responded...

RemixContest wrote:There's several types of CD quality according to Sony (The inventor of the CD). Starting at 128kbps and reaching up to Transparent quality at 320kbps.

When we mentioned CD quality MP3s, we were referring to the first one @ 128kbps.. Please don't get us wrong here, we are professionals and try very hard to please everyone in this forum, but don't be put off by a poorly explained/understood comment..

Hi, besides the fact that this contest sucks, the CD is a invention from a man with the name Russel and later Philips in Holland ! And MP3*128 has nothing to do with CD quality Bory! And Sony and Philips made it what it is now together in a later stadium.

D vid

Hmm.. I was under the impression that Sony was the original inventor of the CD, I guess bringing it to market is different than inventing it..

Good point David

Also how do you explain the fact that when I try to save a file, for example in Sound Forge, it states that 128kbps MP3 is CD quality.. And it goes up to 320kbps, which is considered transparent CD quality...??

Much appreciated

piZMo · Post by **piZMo** » Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:51 pm

I e-mailed you for the link for the vocal and it didn't work, sounds like i didn't miss much anyway, your '128kbps' CD quality claim is rubbish and is probably based on some housewife market research as to what the average consumer will not be able to tell the difference between CD quality and various MP3 quality (which i actually have read somewhere is 192kbps anyway) and nothing to do with actual technical specifications for CD format.

I mean lets not be "silly" any audio professional would know that CD is 16bit 441000hz and the bit rate is 1411.2 kbps:

44,100 samples per second × 16 bits per sample × 2 channels = 1,411,200 bit/s = 1,411.2 kbit/s.

Daim · Post by **Daim** » Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:58 pm

if u actually were "award Winning Producers who've hit #1 consistently"
there would not be any point in constantly hiding ur name.. right?

rob lee · Post by **rob lee** » Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:13 pm

Daim wrote:if u actually were "award Winning Producers who've hit #1 consistently"
there would not be any point in constantly hiding ur name.. right?

Hit the nail on the head mate

BoryZee · Post by **BoryZee** » Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:19 am

this thread is one of the coolest.. Going 4000 strong and then some..

SonnyBonnier · Post by **SonnyBonnier** » Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:22 am

Remix Contest Rules:

1 - 10: Bla Bla Bla

11: All remixes submitted for this contest become the legal property of the REMIXUS TEAM and it's affiliated companies"

12 - 13: Bla Bla Bla

F--K That.

BoryZee · Post by **BoryZee** » Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:52 pm

12: Bla Bla Bla

13. You may upload your remix to MySpace and other online Communities, Share it with friends, and Publicly Perform it, but it must be labeled as such:
Artist: (To be announced after August 31st, 2008)
Track: "Only for Tonight" or "Blue Flame"
Remix Title: DJ___'s RemixUs Contest Entry
Label: White Label

How about that one?

Khazul · Post by **Khazul** » Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:55 pm

SonnyBonnier wrote:Remix Contest Rules:

1 - 10: Bla Bla Bla

11: All remixes submitted for this contest become the legal property of the REMIXUS TEAM and it's affiliated companies"

12 - 13: Bla Bla Bla

F--K That.

See what my producer has to say about that

BoryZee · Post by **BoryZee** » Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:57 pm

Khazul wrote: See what my producer has to say about that

it's normal contest rules.. most remix competitions go according to these guidelines.. but check with your producer first please.

BoryZee · Post by **BoryZee** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:28 am

Tone Deft · Post by **Tone Deft** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:36 am

haven't you been ridiculed enough?

BoryZee · Post by **BoryZee** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:39 am

that's not what we're here for..

cute picture..

beatpoet · Post by **beatpoet** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:56 am

BoryZee wrote:
FMB wrote:
blinkeye wrote:my favorite part from the kvr forum he spammed as RemixContest:
when questioned about this, he responded...

Hi, besides the fact that this contest sucks, the CD is a invention from a man with the name Russel and later Philips in Holland ! And MP3*128 has nothing to do with CD quality Bory! And Sony and Philips made it what it is now together in a later stadium.

D vid
Hmm.. I was under the impression that Sony was the original inventor of the CD, I guess bringing it to market is different than inventing it..

Good point David

Also how do you explain the fact that when I try to save a file, for example in Sound Forge, it states that 128kbps MP3 is CD quality.. And it goes up to 320kbps, which is considered transparent CD quality...??

Much appreciated

I hope you paid for that copy of Soundforge you can't use.

Comn, even the n00bieist numpty knows that a 128kbps MP3 is not anything equivalent to CD quality. You're obliviously having a laugh here, I really don't think anybody here will be taking you seriously.

I bet all these DJ's and radio stations will be just delighted when you hit them up with a 128mbps mp3.

Get a life FFS

ThrowAway · Post by **ThrowAway** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:01 pm

BoryZee wrote:this thread is one of the coolest.. Going 4000 strong and then some..

As the saying goes "any publicity is good publicity" right?

BoryZee · Post by **BoryZee** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:40 pm

ThrowAway wrote:
BoryZee wrote:this thread is one of the coolest.. Going 4000 strong and then some..
As the saying goes "any publicity is good publicity" right?

You said it best so far.. Good thinking..