Man, you got this rowdy classroom quiet in a hurry!Ableton_David wrote:Hi everyone - I'd like to address some of the concerns here.
Regarding spam - a certain amount of this is inevitable with any competition. There's a difficult line to draw between active self-promotion across different networks, and going overkill. If you're looking for sincere feedback on a track, then it's best to send it to people that you trust, or communities that might be interested in giving you some tips. Otherwise, there are nearly 2,000 entries - it's hard to expect deep and sincere feedback, unsolicited, with such a large pool of entries.
Voting in the Beat the Clock is limited to one vote per track per person. In cases where we can positively identify that an entrant has obtained votes through illegitimate means, we will take appropriate actions and the entrant risks being disqualified. Please leave it to us, however, to identify these cases. I know some things might look suspicious on the surface, but without proof it can quickly turn in to an online shouting match - and no one needs another one of those. Try to focus instead on promoting your own work, and checking out some of the other incredible entries.
Lastly, some clarification about the judging process. The 25 entries with the most votes will be judged by M83, Junior Boys and Nosaj Thing. Their top 10 picks will win prizes. As such, even if someone did manage to get his/her track into the top 25 through shady tactics, it's not likely to make it to the top 10.
Of course, no competition is fool-proof, and no voting system is perfect. We have strived to make Beat the Clock as even and fair as possible - for example, through adding a random list of tracks that appears on the home page every time you refresh it. Thanks again to everyone who has entered - and remember that you can keep voting until June 15!
Seriously, thanks for the input, and taking time to address this.
Chris