Groups within groups
Groups within groups
I'd like to be able to group tracks inside of other groups. I often find that I'd like to compress different parts inside of a group together before reaching the bus compressor on the group track. It would mean that I can be more efficient and won't have to create new busses every time I want to do more complicated techniques to achieve bus compression, or whatever else effect I would use on a group track.
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:29 pm
- Location: Norway
Re: Groups within groups
Racks within racks is so much fun, and I imagine groups within groups would be too.
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 2:53 pm
Re: Groups within groups
Yeah !
Like a mixbus (BUSS Track) in a group or a group within a group
Like a mixbus (BUSS Track) in a group or a group within a group
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 2:53 pm
Re: Groups within groups
Take this improovement forward, its that simple - ok, we are lazy, Hedflux want it, i want it and im shure a lot of other artists would be happy about it!
So support that wish <3
So support that wish <3
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:07 am
- Contact:
Re: Groups within groups
+ 1 one for more grouping possibility.
https://soundcloud.com/sternenlicht/rohkostler
Live 9.5 / Push / Omnisphere / Elektron Analog 4 / Analog RYTM /Octatrack
Live 9.5 / Push / Omnisphere / Elektron Analog 4 / Analog RYTM /Octatrack
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 1:24 pm
Re: Groups within groups
+1
It would help a lot.
It would help a lot.
-
- Posts: 4598
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:42 am
- Location: Hoerikwaggo's sunset side...
- Contact:
Re: Groups within groups
yebo yes for groups wiffin groups
Re: Groups within groups
+1 more flexible mixing
https://soundcloud.com/sam-steensenThe Finn wrote:Believe you me, after the coming apocalypse, when we are all reduced to huddling around little fires in the smoking ruins, your Ableton Push is not going to make any sounds.
Re: Groups within groups
I think they worry about gui clarity.
To illustrate - Heres four groups: Loops[1,2,3,4] Bass1[5,6,7] Bass2 [8,9,10,11] , bass2original[12], bass fx[13,14]
Heres what they fear - Bassgroups[ Loops[1,2,3,4] ,Bass1[5,6,7,Bass2 [8,9,10,11,bass2original[12]],bass fx[13,14] ]
now, does that look a little confusing? That's the problem they would need to solve, and its an issue throughout Live. There is not a clear uniform handling of nested hierarchies. EG in the second example, is bass fx a sibling of Bass1 or Bass2? It's hard to see isn't it.
Tl;dr - I agree, but its not a simple solution, they need to address some big things.
To illustrate - Heres four groups: Loops[1,2,3,4] Bass1[5,6,7] Bass2 [8,9,10,11] , bass2original[12], bass fx[13,14]
Heres what they fear - Bassgroups[ Loops[1,2,3,4] ,Bass1[5,6,7,Bass2 [8,9,10,11,bass2original[12]],bass fx[13,14] ]
now, does that look a little confusing? That's the problem they would need to solve, and its an issue throughout Live. There is not a clear uniform handling of nested hierarchies. EG in the second example, is bass fx a sibling of Bass1 or Bass2? It's hard to see isn't it.
Tl;dr - I agree, but its not a simple solution, they need to address some big things.