Apply LFO to automation parameters
Apply LFO to automation parameters
Probably the one thing I would like to see above anything else in Live is the ability to apply an LFO to automation parameters.
So often I have had to draw the automation or manually record it, but all I want is a saw wave, or sine wave, or square wave applied.
Just wondering if anyone else would like to see this too? I can't be the only one who would like to see this.
So often I have had to draw the automation or manually record it, but all I want is a saw wave, or sine wave, or square wave applied.
Just wondering if anyone else would like to see this too? I can't be the only one who would like to see this.
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
Max for Live LFO does this.
-
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 1:34 am
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
Yeah M4L's LFO is the way to go.
Also, some instruments already have this functionality. In operator, for example, you can set a bunch of stuff to be controlled by the built in LFO.
Also, some instruments already have this functionality. In operator, for example, you can set a bunch of stuff to be controlled by the built in LFO.
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
The drawback of the M4L LFO is it will completely take over the absolute automation, rather than being a relative modulation. Also it will probably crash your live set.
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
I was more thinking native rather than through M4L so that I didn't need a M4L device every time I wanted to automate a parameter with a sine wave.
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
I have noticed noise when modulating volume 100% with M4L lfo
Also there is a delay. This is bad :/
Also there is a delay. This is bad :/
-
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:29 pm
- Location: Norway
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
Yes. We need a native solution for this.Angstrom wrote:The drawback of the M4L LFO is it will completely take over the absolute automation, rather than being a relative modulation. Also it will probably crash your live set.
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
would also love to see this
Subbase
Subbase-Recordings
https://subbase.bandcamp.com/
https://soundcloud.com/subbasednb
can also be found here
https://www.facebook.com/DnBSubbase
Subbase-Recordings
https://subbase.bandcamp.com/
https://soundcloud.com/subbasednb
can also be found here
https://www.facebook.com/DnBSubbase
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
+1
Would very much love this. And most certainly would love a random waveform as a modulator as well. This would be amazing.
- Dan
Would very much love this. And most certainly would love a random waveform as a modulator as well. This would be amazing.
- Dan
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
While M4L LFO works fine for me most of the time, I too would prefer a native one with relative automation.
In the meantime, in my Clips folder within Places, I've saved a bunch of empty MIDI clips with pre-drawn oscillating automation. From the usual sine shape through to Square, from 1/2 to 1/16 time, and a few unusual ones, each in their own labeled clip. These I can just copy and paste into other clips or use them in a dummy clip matrix to route audio through.
I must admit I never use those anymore as LFO does the job.
Might be useful to someone without M4L or who doesn't want to use it though.
In the meantime, in my Clips folder within Places, I've saved a bunch of empty MIDI clips with pre-drawn oscillating automation. From the usual sine shape through to Square, from 1/2 to 1/16 time, and a few unusual ones, each in their own labeled clip. These I can just copy and paste into other clips or use them in a dummy clip matrix to route audio through.
I must admit I never use those anymore as LFO does the job.
Might be useful to someone without M4L or who doesn't want to use it though.
-
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: Another Green World
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
Native LFO is a must.
M4L LFO is a bust.
M4L LFO is a bust.
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
Yes, it is vital. Such a useful and versatile function needs to be native. Envelope and Envelope follower too. All these basic building blocks.
The CPU use of just one LFO is the mad notes.
The CPU use of just one LFO is the mad notes.
-
- Posts: 7033
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:34 am
Re: Apply LFO to automation parameters
There seems to be a PC-only VST LFO plug-in at http://lfox8.0fees.net/ amde by KVRAudio mmbet towncat. I haven't tried it, so have no idea if it's a useful concept.
Make some music!