Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch

Share your wishes for the future of Ableton Live
Stromkraft
Posts: 7033
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:34 am

Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch

Post by Stromkraft » Tue May 30, 2017 1:41 pm

miletbaker wrote: SUG-0982 (created 2 years ago) with 38 upvotes


If you want MPE support then please make your voice heard!
That link was erroneous!

This is the actual link to SUG-0982: support 'expressive' controllers, using voice per (midi) channel / MPE.
Make some music!

thomashalp
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:35 am

Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch

Post by thomashalp » Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:28 pm

so i couldnt apply for the beta anymore, i sent them a message to check whats up but havent heard back.
Any luck on upvoting this?
really really really hope we can get this in ableton 10

Bob3210
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2017 9:11 pm

Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch

Post by Bob3210 » Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:39 pm

For now I'm holding off buying Live, waiting for MPE support.

hyperscientist
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:37 pm

Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch

Post by hyperscientist » Fri Nov 03, 2017 7:39 am

Why oh why no MPE in Live 10… ;(

Stromkraft
Posts: 7033
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:34 am

Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch

Post by Stromkraft » Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:02 am

Why are you guys lamenting MPE in a thread about Polyphonic Aftertouch?
Make some music!

hyperscientist
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:37 pm

Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch

Post by hyperscientist » Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:20 am

Stromkraft wrote:Why are you guys lamenting MPE in a thread about Polyphonic Aftertouch?
While you are pointing our minor semantic mistakes you could also campaign to change the topic of this thread to "Support for Aftertouch" since aftertouch is poly in nature and the mono variant is called channel pressure :P

Stromkraft
Posts: 7033
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:34 am

Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch

Post by Stromkraft » Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:04 am

hyperscientist wrote:
Stromkraft wrote:Why are you guys lamenting MPE in a thread about Polyphonic Aftertouch?
While you are pointing our minor semantic mistakes you could also campaign to change the topic of this thread to "Support for Aftertouch" since aftertouch is poly in nature and the mono variant is called channel pressure :P
It's not minor! It's about barking up the wrong tree. Make your own MPE threads please. That polyphonic aftertouch wasn't implemented day 1 of adding MIDI to Live a decade or so ago was, and unfortunately still is, a disgrace.
Make some music!

thomashalp
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:35 am

Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch

Post by thomashalp » Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:31 am

Better for All of us if we campaign for support. On both these protocols together!!!!!
Very hyped about 10 but very upset about either of these not being implemented :(((
Maybe some hope for a future 10.... update

Stromkraft
Posts: 7033
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:34 am

Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch

Post by Stromkraft » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:45 pm

thomashalp wrote:Better for All of us if we campaign for support. On both these protocols together!!!!!
Very hyped about 10 but very upset about either of these not being implemented :(((
Maybe some hope for a future 10.... update
May I suggest you create that thread then? Maybe even a poll in it? While these two protocols could share some tech under the hood I'm not sure the GUI should display the data in a similar way. These are different technologies by different creators.

At the moment I lack experience of MPE, but I'm all for its inclusion.
Make some music!

Post Reply