Page 11 of 11
Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch
Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 1:41 pm
by Stromkraft
miletbaker wrote:
SUG-0982 (created 2 years ago) with 38 upvotes
…
If you want MPE support then please make your voice heard!
That link was erroneous!
This is the actual link to
SUG-0982: support 'expressive' controllers, using voice per (midi) channel / MPE.
Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:28 pm
by thomashalp
so i couldnt apply for the beta anymore, i sent them a message to check whats up but havent heard back.
Any luck on upvoting this?
really really really hope we can get this in ableton 10
Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:39 pm
by Bob3210
For now I'm holding off buying Live, waiting for MPE support.
Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 7:39 am
by hyperscientist
Why oh why no MPE in Live 10… ;(
Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:02 am
by Stromkraft
Why are you guys lamenting MPE in a thread about Polyphonic Aftertouch?
Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:20 am
by hyperscientist
Stromkraft wrote:Why are you guys lamenting MPE in a thread about Polyphonic Aftertouch?
While you are pointing our minor semantic mistakes you could also campaign to change the topic of this thread to "Support for Aftertouch" since aftertouch is poly in nature and the mono variant is called channel pressure
Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:04 am
by Stromkraft
hyperscientist wrote:Stromkraft wrote:Why are you guys lamenting MPE in a thread about Polyphonic Aftertouch?
While you are pointing our minor semantic mistakes you could also campaign to change the topic of this thread to "Support for Aftertouch" since aftertouch is poly in nature and the mono variant is called channel pressure :P
It's not minor! It's about barking up the wrong tree. Make your own
MPE threads please. That
polyphonic aftertouch wasn't implemented day 1 of adding MIDI to
Live a decade or so ago was, and unfortunately still is, a disgrace.
Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:31 am
by thomashalp
Better for All of us if we campaign for support. On both these protocols together!!!!!
Very hyped about 10 but very upset about either of these not being implemented
((
Maybe some hope for a future 10.... update
Re: Support for Polyphonic Aftertouch
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:45 pm
by Stromkraft
thomashalp wrote:Better for All of us if we campaign for support. On both these protocols together!!!!!
Very hyped about 10 but very upset about either of these not being implemented :(((
Maybe some hope for a future 10.... update
May I suggest you create that thread then? Maybe even a poll in it? While these two protocols could share some tech under the hood I'm not sure the GUI should display the data in a similar way. These are different technologies by different creators.
At the moment I lack experience of MPE, but I'm all for its inclusion.