Tracking to Live - Very poor sound quality
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:39 pm
Tracking to Live - Very poor sound quality
Hi,
I've been away from Live for some time... but just upgraded; lots of good stuff in there.
One major problem, that I am sure is something I'm missing.
I track from my mixer into Live (Mainly from MPC and various sound modules). This is no problem in Samplitude SE or Cubase LE, but in Live it produces nasty, low quality distorted wav files. I know it must be a simple setting, but I just can't find what it is. I've fiddled in the Audio preferences with no luck. Any ideas?
J
I've been away from Live for some time... but just upgraded; lots of good stuff in there.
One major problem, that I am sure is something I'm missing.
I track from my mixer into Live (Mainly from MPC and various sound modules). This is no problem in Samplitude SE or Cubase LE, but in Live it produces nasty, low quality distorted wav files. I know it must be a simple setting, but I just can't find what it is. I've fiddled in the Audio preferences with no luck. Any ideas?
J
PC Laptop & Intel Macbook, Presonus Firebox, Echo Indigo DJ, MPC 2500, Planet Phatt, Xiosynth, microX, Kontrol 49, Live 6, Reason 4, Guru, ASS Modeling Collection, Pro53, Oddity, Fender Telecaster, an old acoustic guitar, Some mics, my sister's voice...
-
- Posts: 4938
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 3:38 pm
- Location: Sticks and stones
I used to get something like this in version 3 with my Emagic 2/6. I never found out what it was but it went away.
Hope this helps!
Hope this helps!
Suit #1: I mean, have you got any insight as to why a bright boy like this would jeopardize the lives of millions?
Suit #2: No, sir, he says he does this sort of thing for fun.
Suit #2: No, sir, he says he does this sort of thing for fun.
-
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 5:07 am
- Location: Melbourne AU
- Contact:
If you're only tracking with no warping why should it matter what warp setting you have.Angstrom wrote:yes,
don't use 'complex' as any kind of default for tracking.
recommended
preferences -> record warp launch -> default warp mode = beats.
beats means 'off' if the BPM stays the same, so it won't mangle your wave.
If warping is off the tracking should sound the same as what you were monitoring, shouldn't it?
If warping is off, then yes it'll sound the same, if not, then it could sound different depending on what warp algorithm you're using.
tarekith
https://tarekith.com
https://tarekith.com
live has a preference setting to warp recorded clips. I assume the sound quality issue was during re-playing audio, not simply during monitoring (?)Dan Dare wrote:If you're only tracking with no warping why should it matter what warp setting you have.Angstrom wrote:yes,
don't use 'complex' as any kind of default for tracking.
recommended
preferences -> record warp launch -> default warp mode = beats.
beats means 'off' if the BPM stays the same, so it won't mangle your wave.
If warping is off the tracking should sound the same as what you were monitoring, shouldn't it?
as the OP refers to'wav files' I would recommend setting wav files bit depth to at least 24 bit in preferences (for clip recording)
Anyway, If you record audio into a clip it will most likely have warping on playback by default. Some users select 'complex' as their standard warp algo, assuming it is 'better'. In fact it is simply a different type of timestretch, 'frequency windowing' was just too long to put in the pulldown I guess.
this may not be the issue, hard to tell from here!