Lol... Way to long to render this one.

Discussion of anything not related to audio or music production
Post Reply
Mint Invader
Posts: 1508
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:37 pm

Lol... Way to long to render this one.

Post by Mint Invader » Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:24 am

Ever have a full track that takes 20 minutes to render.

Yeaaaaaaa...
Because Whatever.

martinkellogs
Posts: 355
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:56 pm

Re: Lol... Way to long to render this one.

Post by martinkellogs » Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:15 am

Mint Invader wrote:Ever have a full track that takes 20 minutes to render.

Yeaaaaaaa...

nope. that's why i'm on a PC.

timothyallan
Posts: 5788
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Re: Lol... Way to long to render this one.

Post by timothyallan » Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:26 am

I have one 8 min track that took 50+ minutes to render as it only uses 1 core when doing so. It was faster for me to set a new audio track to "resample" and record it realtime using all 12 cores :)

With rendering just being able to use one core, I'm having to use it less and less or I just sit waiting and waiting!

LoopStationZebra
Posts: 10586
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Lol... Way to long to render this one.

Post by LoopStationZebra » Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:11 am

martinkellogs wrote:
Mint Invader wrote:Ever have a full track that takes 20 minutes to render.

Yeaaaaaaa...

yup. but i loves me a good wank so that 20min flies by in no time flat.

accuracy counts.
I came for the :lol:
But stayed for the :x

beats me
Posts: 23319
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:39 pm

Re: Lol... Way to long to render this one.

Post by beats me » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:46 pm

If your song renders in a shorter period of time than it took to render the 3D version of Avatar your song is crap. :x

I currently have a track that has been rendering since October. :x

beats me
Posts: 23319
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:39 pm

Re: Lol... Way to long to render this one.

Post by beats me » Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:48 am

scutheotaku wrote:
beats me wrote:If your song renders in a shorter period of time than it took to render the 3D version of Avatar your song is crap. :x
"Creating the Na'vi characters and the virtual world of Pandora required over a petabyte of digital storage,[109] and each minute of the final footage for Avatar occupies 17.28 gigabytes of storage"

8O

http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/arch ... nd-avatar/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar_%28 ... al_effects

Another testimonial as to why people who are clamoring to get a 256G SSD drive for $500 are a pack of retards. Size matters.

Post Reply