Lol... Way to long to render this one.

[Mint Invader]

Ever have a full track that takes 20 minutes to render.

Yeaaaaaaa...

[martinkellogs]

Ever have a full track that takes 20 minutes to render.

Yeaaaaaaa...

nope. that's why i'm on a PC.

[timothyallan]

I have one 8 min track that took 50+ minutes to render as it only uses 1 core when doing so. It was faster for me to set a new audio track to "resample" and record it realtime using all 12 cores

With rendering just being able to use one core, I'm having to use it less and less or I just sit waiting and waiting!

[LoopStationZebra]

Ever have a full track that takes 20 minutes to render.

Yeaaaaaaa...

yup. but i loves me a good wank so that 20min flies by in no time flat.

accuracy counts.

[beats me]

If your song renders in a shorter period of time than it took to render the 3D version of Avatar your song is crap.

I currently have a track that has been rendering since October.

[beats me]

If your song renders in a shorter period of time than it took to render the 3D version of Avatar your song is crap.

"Creating the Na'vi characters and the virtual world of Pandora required over a petabyte of digital storage,[109] and each minute of the final footage for Avatar occupies 17.28 gigabytes of storage"



http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/arch ... nd-avatar/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar_%28 ... al_effects

Another testimonial as to why people who are clamoring to get a 256G SSD drive for $500 are a pack of retards. Size matters.