

myrnova wrote:
In which world you live?!![]()
Most of people ARE workers. Only, they have no rights anymore thanks to U.S. so-called "globalization" policy. For instance, here we have only part-time jobs, monthly contracts, etc. We call it "the new slavery". It's like coming back to 1800. Thank you, yankees!
andydes wrote:myrnova wrote:
In which world you live?!![]()
Most of people ARE workers. Only, they have no rights anymore thanks to U.S. so-called "globalization" policy. For instance, here we have only part-time jobs, monthly contracts, etc. We call it "the new slavery". It's like coming back to 1800. Thank you, yankees!
In the world of doing techy shit for a huge multinational. Not too evil a multinational, mind you, but I'm fully aware that shareholders interests are the priority. Probably more than many here. I could tell you some stories about that.
The point is that although we still have most of the population working to make a few rich, the dynamics have changed. Some people could do well to address the way society has changed.
I don't doubt your claim that US Criminal policy will enter into Egypt.U.S. criminal policy. In egypt, too (just wait an see...)
Maybe I'm ignorant but I don't think there's much keeping a person (here, in the US) from starting their own business if they want. Keeping it afloat and successful otoh I think has a lot to do with the owner themselves, if they've already made sound choices in location and logistics, etc. But the majority of people don't consider it or know what they would do, hence the term "sheeple". Now corporations may be making it a lot harder for small businesses in a lot of areas, but there's still technically the ability to not be a "slave". Also, that doesn't have anything to do with beingIf you mean "there are less slaves in factories because the new slaves now work in call-center" I agree with you. Apart of the fact the same kind of 1800 slavery nowadays is called "employee" or smth
I just mean the world has changed. If you want to get people on board for some kind of socialist revolution, you need to put it in terms that people relate to instead of making it sound like the 19 century.myrnova wrote:
If you mean "there are less slaves in factories because the new slaves now work in call-center" I agree with you. Apart of the fact the same kind of 1800 slavery nowadays is called "employee" or smth
Good for you! The world is a better place for that!shadx312 wrote: Also, I'm a Pepsi/Mtn Dew guy. I used to only use Coke as an alternative drain cleaner and for mixed drinks but I switched to club soda and seltzer for mixed drinks awhile ago.
Funk N. Furter wrote:
You do not understand the concept of worker because you are not one.
BTW you have just undermined your own point — this is basically saying that the middle class and peasants can't exist because they are working for employers.Funk N. Furter wrote:an employee is an employee and therefore most likely working class even if he is under the illusion that he is santa claus.